Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
As shown in Figure 3 A, the 20 M-HP group crossed the platform the most times, 6.39 ± 0.46, which was a significant increase of 47.15% compared with the 20 M-C group of 4.32 ± 0.56 ( p < 0.05); the 16 M-HP group crossed the platform the most times, 5.31 ± 0.78, which was a highly significant increase compared with the 16 M-C group of 2.06 ± 0.34 ( p < 0.05), 157.77% ( p < 0.01); and the 9 M-HP group traversed the platform 4.95 ± 0.89 times with a highly significant improvement of 150% ( p < 0.01) over that of 9 M-C of 1.98 ± 0.14.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
However, for CHD death, the pooled effect size showed a marginally significant ( p = 0.05) 7% reduction in CHD death for the n-3 PUFA intervention groups, an outcome which included sudden cardiac death, deaths due to ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure in patients with CHD, as well as deaths occurring after coronary revascularization or heart transplant.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
When two groups were defined a posteriori based on the insulin values of LDIGIT (120–150 min) , there was a borderline significant group by time interaction for PAI-1 ( p = 0.05; n = 49) and the change in PAI-1 was greater in the insulin-resistant group (177, 61 for HMD vs. 128, 52 ng/mL for HWD; p < 0.001) than in the insulin-sensitive group (137, 80 for HMD vs. 113, 39 ng/mL for HWD; p = 0.02).
nominally significantp -value < 0.051.0× alphagold
Evidence Classification and Quality Assessment Each unique association that was nominally significant ( p -value < 0.05) was classified as strong evidence (Class I), highly suggestive evidence (Class II), suggestive evidence (Class III) or weak associations (Class IV), with regard to epidemiological validity criteria ( Table S2 ) [ 21 ].
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
After false discovery rate ( FDR ) correction, pathway enrichment analyses for genes harboring nominally significant ( p < 0.05) probes identified 44 significant pathways ( q < 0.05), and 5 pathways were related to lipid metabolism.
borderline significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
The GLM results indicated that e-nutrition literacy had a strong and borderline significant main effect on positive nutrition attitudes (β = 5.588, p = 0.050), suggesting that individuals with high e-nutrition literacy scored on average 5.59 points higher in positive nutrition attitudes compared to those with lower levels.
highly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Notably, the study concluded that glycaemic response could be predicted independently using microbiome data and demonstrated highly significant interpersonal variation of glycaemic responses to both interventions ( p < 0.05), reinforcing previous findings that metabolic responses to food are interpersonal and vary significantly between individuals [ 19 ].
an increasing trendp ≤ 0.051.0× alphagold
The odds ratio showed an increasing trend with longer follow-up periods (OR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.36–2.13; p ≤ 0.05 at ≤1 month, OR = 1.86; 95% CI 1.50–2.32; p ≤ 0.05 at ≤3 months, OR = 2.29; 95% CI 1.90–2.75; p ≤ 0.05 at ≤4 months, OR = 2.40; 95% CI 1.99–2.91; p ≤ 0.05 at ≤6 months, OR = 2.50; 95% CI 2.11–2.97; p ≤ 0.05 at ≤1 year).