Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
After false discovery rate ( FDR ) correction, pathway enrichment analyses for genes harboring nominally significant ( p < 0.05) probes identified 44 significant pathways ( q < 0.05), and 5 pathways were related to lipid metabolism.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
However, the analysis demonstrated a borderline significant effect of zinc supplementation in combination with other micronutrients on the risk of malaria parasitaemia compared with placebo ( p = 0.05, log RR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.03–2.59, I 2 = 99.22%, with 8904 malaria cases in the zinc intake group and 522 malaria cases in the placebo group).
showed a trendp = 0.0501.0× alpha
The body fluid recovery ratio was 24.0 ± 6.0% in the CW, which showed a trend toward being lower compared to the W trial (42.9 ± 5.4%; mean difference: −20.66%, 95% CI: [−41.40, 0.08]%, p = 0.050), and was significantly less than in the EW (45.4 ± 8.0%; mean difference: −22.96%, 95% CI: [−43.24, −2.68]%, p = 0.021) and ECW (47.8 ± 6.6%; mean difference: −25.53%, 95% CI: [−46.27, −4.79]%, p = 0.010) trials ( Figure 1 B). 3.2.
nearly significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Also at the beginning of the study, the median sIgE value in response to rMal d 1 was 0.99 kU/L (range 0.04–94.60 kU/L) The patients showed a significant decrease of the median sIgE in response to Bet v 1 (10.60 to 5.19 kU/L; p = 0.01) and a nearly significant decrease of sIgE in response to rMal d 1 (0.99 to 0.61 kU/L; p = 0.05) after 2 years of BP-AIT ( Figure 2 ).
In a 12-month, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial (VIDOMA trial), we previously found evidence for a greater improvement with omega-3 LCPUFA with or without vitamin D in social interaction in children with ASD compared with placebo but the difference did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05) for most comparisons.
slightly significantp < 0.051.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In addition, slightly significant correlations were found between OT ( r = 0.196, p < 0.05; r = 0.182, p < 0.05; r = 0.140, p < 0.05, respectively) and OD ( r = 0.191, p < 0.05; r = 0.205, p < 0.05; r = 0.264, p < 0.01), versus the attention, language, and visuospatial/executive subscores of cognitive abilities ( Figure 4 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
The GLM results indicated that e-nutrition literacy had a strong and borderline significant main effect on positive nutrition attitudes (β = 5.588, p = 0.050), suggesting that individuals with high e-nutrition literacy scored on average 5.59 points higher in positive nutrition attitudes compared to those with lower levels.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
When examining weight loss categorically (achievement of 5% weight loss or more), however, there was a marginally significant interaction between Weighing at post and food addiction (χ 2 (1) = 3.98, p = 0.05) and significant main effects of Weighing at post (χ 2 (1) = 10, p = 0.002) and food addiction (χ 2 (1) = 4.73, p = 0.03).