Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

a nonsignificant trendP = 0.29185.8× alphagold
The percentage of potential T-cell responses achieved in each category revealed a nonsignificant trend toward higher responses among ACPA + RA patients to the created peptides (33%) than to no change (17%; P = 0.2918) and destroyed (13%; P = 0.1692) peptide groups, in addition to significantly more frequent responses among ACPA + RA patients to the created peptides (33%) than observed for the controls by χ 2 test (2.5%; P = 0.0002; Fig. 6b ).
a near-significant trendP = 0.397.8× alphagold
Indeed, postextinction l -DOPA administration significantly increased the number of potential CS+ offset-related vmPFC pattern reactivations (time × group: F 3,114 = 3.51, P = 0.02, partial η 2 = 0.09; n = 40), particularly 45 min after extinction and there was still a near-significant trend 90 min after extinction (post hoc two-sample t test; pre: P = 0.39; post: 10 min: P = 0.09; 45 min: T 38 = −3.05, P = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 0.97; 90 min: T 38 = −1.95, P = 0.06, Cohen’s d = 0.62; n = 40; Fig. 2e ).
showed a trendp = 0.56011.2× alpha
2c ) .When we excluded the good prognosis subgroup (Q4 PFS) from the survival analysis, the SENS signature showed a trend in separating the PFS curves of “SENS+ without the 75 th percentile” (SENS+ w/o 75 th ) and SENS─ patients (mPFS values of 9.30 and 6.30 months, respectively; p = 0.560) (Fig. 2c ).
a decreasing trendp = 0.94118.8× alphagold
Moreover, by looking into the pattern of change over time, we noticed that the face inversion effect did not show a decreasing trend from the second test session to the end of the HDTBR (linear trend test for the effect from BR13 to BR 43: F (1,14) = 0.01, p = 0.941), standing in stark contrast to the gradual change of the BM inversion effect during the same test period (linear trend test: F (1, 11) = 32.38, p < 0.001).