Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginal significanceP = 0.061.2× alphagold
We found that the presence of Ssk-FB4s was always associated with stronger resistance against viral, bacterial and fungal infection in all datasets 71 – 73 : the comparison reaches marginal significance in one set with female flies subjected to bacterial infection ( P = 0.06, Supplementary Fig. 19 ), and significance in another two sets with flies subjected to fungal infection ( P = 0.002 and P = 0.02, respectively).
a statistical trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Furthermore, a statistical trend in the interaction effect was also found F(2, 26) = 3.15, p = 0.06 in which post-hoc comparisons revealed that only in the opsin condition animals at phase 20 cm kept significantly increased defensive distances compared to phase 10 cm as well as to phase none ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.001) respectably, while no differences were found within the control group.
marginally nonsignificantP =0.0601.2× alphagold
Total developmental time from egg to adult emergence ranged between 23 and 31 days and was shorter on smaller hosts (ANCOVA: F 1,109 =8.11, P <0.005, r 2 =0.05, n =112) and shorter in broods developing from larger numbers of eggs (ANCOVA: F 1,109 =32.48, P <0.001, r 2 =0.22, n =112); the interaction between these main effects was marginally nonsignificant (ANCOVA: F 1,108 =3.62, P =0.060, n =112).
a strong trendP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Interestingly, NOD mice treated with BIBO3304 displayed a significant decrease in glucose levels (Placebo, 5.35 ± 0.11 mM; BIBO3304, 5.03 ± 0.09 mM; * P < 0.05), which is associated with a strong trend to increased insulin levels (Placebo, 73.31 ± 9.42 pM; BIBO3304, 103.2 ± 11.87 pM; P = 0.06), indicating that β-cells in a T1D environment are responsive to the inhibition of Y1 receptor signaling.
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In this part of the task, 45 , 46 , the Cyfip1 +/− rats continued to respond to the original S + over successive sessions, while the WT began to switch their choices to the new S + (a 2 × 2 ANOVA revealed a main effect of SESSION ( F (3,39) = 3.67, p < 0.05) and a GENOTYPE × SESSION interaction ( F (3,39) = 3.76, p < 0.05), where a main effect of GENOTYPE was marginally significant ( F (1,13) = 4.32, p = 0.06)).