Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantP = 0.05551.1× alphagold
2i ), a marginally significant increase in approach speed (EYFP: 3.59 ± 0.28; hM4D: 5.24 ± 0.67; P = 0.0555, unpaired t -test) (Fig. 2j ), an increase in the mean duration of individual investigation (EYFP: 3.04 ± 1.16; hM4D: 7.258 ± 1.446; P = 0.0404, unpaired t -test) (Fig. 2k ), and a less percentage of stretched postures towards stimulus mice (EYFP: 86.22 ± 5.90; hM4D: 49.86 ± 6.71; P = 0.0006, unpaired t -test) (Fig. 2l ).
near-significantP value = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Previous study showed that mucin-degraders (family Prevotellaceae) were enriched in patients with depression and anxiety 47 , and a further subgroup analysis of present study also supported a near-significant increase of Akkermansia in unaffected controls with antidepressant ( n = 5, P value = 0.056) when comparing to those without (Supplementary Fig. 9b ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
A marginally significant effect of condition, F (1,15) = 4.31, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.22, revealed higher hit rates when earn colors were presented first relative to when save colors were presented first, specifically at shorter onsets (8 ~ 38), F (1,15) = 4.81, p = 0.044, η 2 = 0.24, where onset information was limited (left panel, Fig. 4a ).
marginally non-significantP =0.0561.1× alpha
Expected parasitism based on a binary regional food web was a marginally non-significant predictor of observed parasitism ( z =1.9, P =0.056, with a partial regression coefficient of 1.9 (s.e.=0.99) for binary data ( Supplementary Table 8a ), compared with 2.3 (s.e.=0.84) for quantitative data ( Supplementary Table 3 ).
marginally significantP =0.0561.1× alphagold
A 6 (SNR) × 2 (group) mixed ANOVA on arcsine-transformed 22 accuracy revealed that older adults were less accurate than young adults irrespective of SNR ( F 1,30 =19.48, P <0.001), and accuracy increased with increasing SNR in both groups ( F 5,150 =399.10, P <0.001), with a marginally significant group × SNR interaction ( F 5,150 =2.21, P =0.056, Fig. 1b ).
a negative trendp value = 0.0571.1× alphagold
Using the genes that contributed most to the enrichment of this upregulated gene set ( n = 48 genes), we built the first principal component (PC1) of their VAT bulk expression and identified a negative trend (rho = −0.242, p value = 0.057) between PC1 of the VAT bulk expression and the adipocyte diameter in RYSA (Supplementary Note 1.7 , Supplementary Data 43 ).
a trend toward significanceP =0.05761.2× alpha
The angular distribution of diurnal acrophases for H3K9Ac peaks proximate to such sites differed from those for peaks distant from such sites ( W =4,572.6, P =0.0136, n =664 samples), and the difference in angular distribution of seasonal acrophases showed a trend toward significance ( W =3,643.2, P =0.0576, n =664 samples).