Women showed a marginally significant better survival when analyzed using the log-rank test ( p = 0.04).
Excerpts
borderline significancep = 0.04
[ 40 ]) reported an increase in the recurrence rate of ischemic stroke by antiplatelet therapy modification with borderline significance (10% vs. 1%, p = 0.04).
In the multivariate data meta-analysis (fixed effects), there was a borderline significant association between sarcopenia and OS (fixed effects, HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.44, P = 0.04, I 2 = 43%; k = 5; n = 831).
Finally, the number of symptoms at diagnosis was a marginally significant predictor of the number of symptoms three months after recovery ( p = 0.04).
a trend toward significancep = 0.04
The on-treatment HBeAg seroconversion in these patients showed a trend toward significance, with 71.4% (5 out of 7) in the MASLD-CHB group compared to 44.9% (40 out of 89) in the CHB non-MASLD group ( p = 0.04).
There were highly significant differences concerning 7- ( p = 0.04) and 30-day mortality ( p = 0.002).
The test for overall heterogeneity was highly significant (Q(4) = 10.14, p = 0.04), reflecting the notable variability in the results.
Although the difference in Psychological Discomfort ( p = 0.094) did not reach statistical significance, the Functional Limitation domain stands out ( p = 0.041).
This difference was statistically significant, and an increasing trend was observed ( p = 0.041). 4.
Regarding lactate, a marginally significant negative association could be seen ( p = 0.042, 95% CI: −1.618–−0.293).
Interestingly, LCDG induced a significant trend of reduction in Ruminococcus ( p = 0.042) and in IL-15 (mean change −173.4; p = 0.042).
However, according to our marginally significant findings ( p = 0.044), we postulate that the end-diastolic cIMR may be rougher than the end-systolic values in KD patients.
A highly significant difference was found for the feeling of being flawed domain ( p = 0.044), with a mean score of 13.4 points.
The differences in the results for vertical atrophy of the alveolar process showed a tendency toward statistical significance ( p = 0.045) ( Figure 10 ).
tendency towards significancep = 0.045
Notably, our bCP group only showed a significant correlation between hip angle and maximal passive knee extension at T2, with a tendency towards significance at T1 ( p = 0.045).
The post hoc analysis revealed a significant difference between MS and MOGAD cohorts (mean difference −81.73 cm 3 , p = 0.012), and a borderline significant difference was noted between MS and HC groups (mean difference −71.4 cm 3 , p = 0.045) ( Figure 3 B).
PED reduction reached borderline significance ( p = 0.0455).
However, a significant difference emerged with respect to the NDI scores, which exhibited an increasing trend in values corresponding to deeper levels of subsidence ( p = 0.0459) with a mean of 10.7 pts for the 2–3 mm subgroup, 11.9 pts for 3–4 mm and 13.5 pts for ≥4 mm of implant migration into adjacent endplate ( Table 3 ). 4.
A similar trend was observed in the GJH-positive group, although the association reached only marginal significance (χ 2 = 3.967; p = 0.046; Cramer’s V = 0.1), which also represents a small effect size.
The association between years of clinical experience and EMST use reached borderline significance (χ 2 (4) = 9.71, p = 0.046).
of borderline significancep = 0.047
Estimates in model 2 indicate that C5a was elevated in COVID-19 patients compared to patients with bacterial sepsis, an association of borderline significance ( p = 0.047).
Assessment by SF-36 at D8 showed that the improvement in Quality of Life was marginally significant for the physical component (37.5 ± 7.9 vs. 42.0 ± 9.7; p = 0.047; ES = 0.88 (0.01; 1.75)) and unchanged for the mental component (36.8 ± 10.6 vs. 36.8 ± 10.2; p = 0.77; ES = 0.1 (−0.74; 0.94)).
In line with a highly significant dependency of the initial FXIII level on the RBC use, a significant blood unit difference of 2 (0–2) vs. 3 (1–4) units ( p = 0.047) was shown between matched controls and substituted patients.
A borderline significant difference in age was observed between the PEEK and 3DPT cohorts (PEEK 59.67 vs. 3DPT 64.26; p = 0.047), and the 3DPT patients had a higher incidence of hypertension (3DPT 66.7%, 28/42 vs.
A borderline significant and weak positive correlation between ELP-3 and the smoking status of the CD patients was demonstrated (r = 0.196, p = 0.047) ( Supplementary Figure S1 and Table S1 ).