Barely Significant

Excerpts

8,476 sentences · 1 filter applied

a significant trendp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
The haplotype analysis, considering a minimum frequency in either group of at least 2%, showed a presence in the overall population of 7 haplotypes with comparable prevalence between cases and controls, with the exception of haplotype CAAC (rs2071590, rs2844482, rs2234694 and rs4880), which exhibited a significant trend toward a protective effect in migraine (OR = 0.49 (95% C.I.: 0.25–0.98), p = 0.044) ( Table 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.04680.9× alphagold
A marginally significant difference in DFI according to AR status was shown in total ( p = 0.0468, more favorable DFI for AR-positive group than AR-negative group); however, the difference in DFI between AR-positive and -negative groups was even clearer in the ERβ-positive group ( p = 0.0285) but was lost in the ERβ-negative group ( p = 0.7734, Figure 4 ).
barely significantlyp = 0.0491.0× alpha
In contrast, at pH 8.4, 8-Br-cGMP increased I-TASK1 evoked at 0, +30, and +60 mV barely significantly ( p = 0.049, two-way ANOVA: pH effect, F(1, 4) = 7.84) and only by 16%, 14%, and 11%, respectively ( Figure 3 (B1,B2); 0 mV, p = 0.002; +30 mV, p < 0.001; +60 mV, p < 0.001, two-way ANOVA followed by Fisher’s PLSD; n = 5).
borderline significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Among three isoforms, only the expression of the MEFV full-length (i1.2) transcript was borderline significant (patients vs. controls, mean ± SD, −0.34 ± 1.1 vs. 0.32 ± 0.79; p = 0.049) while for the transcript lacking exon 2 ( MEFV -d2), p -values exceeded the significance threshold (patients vs. controls, mean ± SD, −0.1 ± 0.79 vs. −0.45 ± 0.65; p = 0.08) ( Figure 2 a–c).