Barely Significant

Excerpts

7,030 sentences · 1 filter applied

near-significantp = 0.4799.6× alphagold
We used a chi-square test to verify that there were no significant or near-significant differences between men and women regarding the amount of weekly practice; the obtained result was (χ 2 = 3.49, p = 0.479, df = 4), (χ 2 = 2.73, p = 0.603, df = 4), and (χ 2 = 3.38, p = 0.496, df = 4) for the first, second, and third practice questions, respectively.
a positive trendp = 0.5911.8× alphagold
For daily averages, both sites presented a positive trend of 0.18 μg m −3 year −1 ( p = 0.59) and 0.15 μg m −3 year −1 ( p = 0.59), while the daily 95th percentiles showed a positive and higher trend (0.27 μg m −3 year −1 ( p = 0.73) and 0.24 μg m −3 year −1 ( p = 0.70)) than daily P5 (0.10 μg m −3 year −1 ( p = 0.49) and 0.07 μg m −3 year −1 ( p = 0.46)).
a positive trendp -value = 0.8216.4× alphagold
After adjusting for potential confounders and other bisphenols, BPA and BPF showed a positive trend, respectively, for the birth weight (BPA: β = 5.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −43.6 to 54.7, p -value = 0.82; BPF: β = 38.5, 95% CI: −18.1 to 95.1, p -value = 0.18) and gestational age (β = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.27, p -value = 0.61 of BPA; β = 0.13, 95% CI: −0.12 to 0.38, p -value = 0.29 of BPF).
Education did not follow an expected trend, as people with the lowest levels of education (less than secondary) were found to have significantly lower odds of being food insecure as compared to those reported having graduated from post-secondary education (OR: 0.553, 95% CI: 0.364–0.840, p < 0.005), with no other levels of education being significantly associated with increased odds of food insecurity.
Prevalence and Predictors of Food Insecurity among Older People in Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health · 2018 · PMC6267450
A significant trend was also found between how many relatives recreational anglers felt they could talk about private matters with and how often they felt a lack of companionship (χ 2 (1) = 117.40, p < 0.001, and r = −0.32), with a similar trend found for friends (χ 2 (1) = 117.40, p < 0.001, and r = −0.29).
Regardless, as our secondary analysis was intended to gain a better appreciation of the levels of community engagement being used as well as the kinds of community engagement elements being utilized, we feel our results demonstrated a clear trend of gaps across the published literature that needs further highlighting.