Excerpts

However, the results show a slightly significant and negative relationship between nursing (β = −1.146, p < 0.1) and pediatrics (β = −2.902, p < 0.05) compared to cardiology, which was the default department category in the models, concerning the citations. 3.2.

Significance was set at p < 0.05, and marginal significance was set at p < 0.10.

For items showing a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the Friedman test, post hoc comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm correction. 3.

In both multivariate and two-level logistic regression models ( Figure 5 and Table S7 ), the cumulative number of indicators for residential traffic and bedroom ventilation habit had nearly significant interaction effects on childhood pneumonia ( p -value < 0.1).

The intrinsic and integrated pathways were, however, borderline significant (at p < 0.10) and given the high levels of covariance between the factors, the non-significance of the pathways is likely due to suppressed covariance [ 47 ].

The average total effect was positive and marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

It was found that the direct effect of housing condition on local participants’ mental health was not significant, at 95% confidence level ( p = 0.055), and borderline significance ( p < 0.10) indicated the mild protective effects of better housing conditions upon mental health.

A Moran’s I test also indicated significant spatial autocorrelation ( p = 0.001) in the rates for TROs and marginal significance for VSOs ( p = 0.10).

However, personal opioid use was close to significance, with lower odds of being in the “High Stigma/High Punitive Policy” class ( p = 0.10), which would be expected.

Furthermore, the interaction of parental monitoring and shyness showed marginally significant effects on children’s PMPU (β = 0.063, p < 0.10).

A marginally significant association ( p < 0.10) was found for non-small cell carcinoma (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.99–1.11).

The relatively significant indicators ( p < 0.05) are regional GDP and urban green rate, and the slightly significant variable ( p < 0.1) is per capita GDP, while the proportions of secondary industry (SIR) and built-up areas are insignificant variables for PM 2.5 concentration.

The finding was marginally significant ( p < 0.10) for the Work and Welfare group.

This study observed that, at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1), older adults exhibited better glycemic control, potentially due to a lower degree of insulin resistance and higher participation/engagement in programs [ 2 ].

control group) and daily smoking status provided qualified support for Hypothesis 2, showing that for daily smokers, exposure to experimental condition affected policy support more considerably, with a marginally significant interaction effect ( F (1, 1124) = 2.83, p < 0.10).

Of these, health status, use of an aid for walking and taking medication for mental health were not equally distributed (borderline significance = p < 0.10) between the two groups; all three variables were of higher proportion in the intervention group.

The value of the probability of the first type error p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant ( p < 0.10 was reported as borderline significant).

Marginally significant improvements were also observed in the subscales of self-kindness (t(132) = 1.66, p = 0.10, d = 0.14) and overidentification (t(132) = 1.88, p = 0.06, d = 0.16).

Trends of marginal significance were indicated by p -values < 0.10.

As illustrated in Model 6 of Table 4 , of the three goal orientations, only team learning-goal orientation had a marginally significant relationship with boundary buffering (γ = 0.60, p < 0.10), failing to support Hypotheses 5a, 5b, and 5c.

If p < 0.05, the effect estimates were considered statistically significant, and borderline significant if p < 0.10 [ 46 ]. 2.2.5.

Grade 1 falls (the least severe, causing no injury) were the most common in both years, and showed a marginally significant decrease in number (0.05 < p <0.1), while the differences for the more severe falls were never significant.

The slope was positive for immigrant students, although only marginally significant (γ13 = 0.06, p < 0.1), indicating that these students had similar falls in academic self-concept to Spanish students.

The only marginally significant predictive factor was self-control with regard to dedication (standardized coefficient = 0.23; p = 0.10). 3.3.

In contrast, the model with TNF-RII showed a trend toward statistical significance ( p ≤ 0.10) for MA21 with increasing TAA-PNC associated with a slight increase in TNF-RII. 3.5.