Barely Significant

Excerpts

7,030 sentences · 1 filter applied

quasi-significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Likewise, in the present study, a quasi-significant association was obtained between attending an oral health education workshop and the level of knowledge in prevention ( p = 0.051), despite the fact that only 10% of pregnant women had attended one of the training workshops on oral health care that were offered at the Health Center.
trending towards significancep = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The results showed significant improvement in average pain (Pre: 4.00 ± 2.29; Post: 3.18 ± 2.26; p = 0.007), pain interference with walking ability (Pre: 4.14 ± 3.20; Post: 3.09 ± 1.976; p = 0.03), and standard and cognitive Timed Up-and-Go scores (Pre: 13.75 ± 5.34; Post: 12.65 ± 5.25; p = 0.04; Pre: 15.12 ± 6.60; Post: 12.71 ± 5.57; p = 0.003, respectively); the overall pain improvement was trending towards significance (Pre: 3.48 ± 2.56; Post: 2.87 ± 1.85; p = 0.051).
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The bootstrap method indicated that the indirect relationship of fathers’ work engagement with their child’s emotional and behavioral problems was marginally significant for fathers (−0.032; 95% CI between −0.029 and −0.001, p = 0.051) and non-significant for mothers (−0.028; 95% CI between −0.027 and −0.001, p = 0.077).
borderline significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
The third important finding of this study is that low eGFR was significantly associated with new-onset hypertension in the traditional definition population ( p < 0.001), whereas the association was only borderline significant in the new definition population ( p = 0.051).
a strong trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Waist Circumference and Waist to Hip Ratio A significant main effect for time was revealed for waist circumference ( p = 0.022, Table 2 ), with all groups decreasing their waist circumference over the 16 weeks, albeit, only a strong trend was statistically identified for IF/SIT at 16 weeks ( p = 0.051).
fell slightly short of significancep = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Postoperatively (1D), the absolute value of global longitudinal strain (GLS) was greater in the RVP group than in the HBP group ( Table 2 ); however, this difference fell slightly short of significance (16.32 ± 2.57 vs. 14.85 ± 2.52%, p = 0.051).