Barely Significant

Excerpts

7,030 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
In addition, a marginally significant group by time effect was found for positive adaptation coping, F (1, 46.18) = 3.94, p = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.03–4.65, Hedges’ g = 1.08, with the intervention group reporting improvements in positive adaptation coping from pre- ( M = 24.80, SD = 3.95) to post- ( M = 25.50, SD = 3.18) assessment compared to participants in the waitlist control group (preassessment: M = 23.57, SD = 4.89; post-assessment: M = 21.95, SD = 3.41).
almost significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
The direct relation between spirituality and instrumental cyberaggression is only significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001), and between spirituality and reactive cyberaggression is significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001) and almost significant for middle school and high school samples (β = −0.22, p = 0.05; β = 0.07, p = 0.06).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).
nearly reached significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
ot included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 2 green exercise participants ( M = 4.378) were significantly greater than those of Level 3 green exercise ( M = 3.506) ( p = 0.011); (3) the main effect of experimental treatment on the number of posture transitions nearly reached significance ( F (2,89) = 3.99, p = 0.05 , η p 2 = 0.064), with a moderate effect size, and zero was included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 3 green exercise participants ( M = 12.030) were almost significantly greater than those of Level 2 green exercise ( M = 4.650) ( p = 0.050); (4) the interaction between experimental treatment and social interaction on the number of sitting posture reached significance ( F (2,89) = 4.246, p = 0.044 , η p 2 = 0.068), with a moderate effect size, and zero was not included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference.