Weekly Drinking The ANCOVA examining post-intervention weekly drinking revealed a marginally significant main effect of condition after controlling for baseline weekly drinking, F (2, 69) = 2.98, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.08.
Excerpts
In addition, a marginally significant group by time effect was found for positive adaptation coping, F (1, 46.18) = 3.94, p = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.03–4.65, Hedges’ g = 1.08, with the intervention group reporting improvements in positive adaptation coping from pre- ( M = 24.80, SD = 3.95) to post- ( M = 25.50, SD = 3.18) assessment compared to participants in the waitlist control group (preassessment: M = 23.57, SD = 4.89; post-assessment: M = 21.95, SD = 3.41).
A positive trend, i.e., a decrease in the number of years of life lost, was noted for cervical cancer (AAPC = −2.1%, p < 0.05), liver cancer (AAPC = −2.5%, p < 0.05), stomach cancer (AAPC = −1.6%, p < 0.05) and leukaemia (AAPC = −1.0, p < 0.05).
In addition, gender showed a negatively though marginally significant relation with Coercive DEL (β = −0.10, p = 0.05), indicating that men might be more susceptible to the negative influence of Coercive DEL.
The mediation analysis highlighted a marginally significant indirect effect from T1 exposure to community violence as a witness to T3 bullying perpetration through T2 CDs, β = 0.02, t = 1.96, p = 0.05, 95% C.I.
Contact with infected animals, consumption of raw milk and socioeconomic status showed a highly significant ( p < 0.05) correlation with seropositivity.
The direct relation between spirituality and instrumental cyberaggression is only significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001), and between spirituality and reactive cyberaggression is significant for the college sample (β = −0.05, p < 0.001) and almost significant for middle school and high school samples (β = −0.22, p = 0.05; β = 0.07, p = 0.06).
The other two variables indicating socioeconomic position (housing and household assets) were also statistically significant ( p < 0.001) and showed a positive trend ( p < 0.05).
showed a trendp > 0.05
Although the glaucoma group showed a trend towards poorer VRQoL on several scales, no statistically significant difference was found among the four ocular condition groups (all p > 0.05).
After the formal implementation of the reform, DIT in Dingyuan County changed significantly and showed an increasing trend (0.24, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.45, p -value < 0.05).
For RS, the omnibus test indicated message condition was marginally significant on perceived absolute ENDS risk, F (2, 192) = 3.02, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.03.
There were no differences between control and exposed groups in terms of height, weight, or smoking status ( p = 0.18, 0.20, 0.98, respectively); age was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) with the mean age in the control group slightly higher than that of the exposed group.
Having one or more chronic medical conditions, being a member of a community of color (African American/black, Hispanic/Latino), and having less income are significant predictors of higher risk perceptions; being female is of near significance ( p = 0.05).
p < 0.01 was regarded as extremely significant, while p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).
When significant and marginally significant ( i.e. , p < 0.05 and p ≤ 0.10) variables from the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate analysis, both age and reason for migration remained statistically significant with p < 0.05. 3.2.
nearly reached significancep = 0.05
ot included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 2 green exercise participants ( M = 4.378) were significantly greater than those of Level 3 green exercise ( M = 3.506) ( p = 0.011); (3) the main effect of experimental treatment on the number of posture transitions nearly reached significance ( F (2,89) = 3.99, p = 0.05 , η p 2 = 0.064), with a moderate effect size, and zero was included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference, while the Level 3 green exercise participants ( M = 12.030) were almost significantly greater than those of Level 2 green exercise ( M = 4.650) ( p = 0.050); (4) the interaction between experimental treatment and social interaction on the number of sitting posture reached significance ( F (2,89) = 4.246, p = 0.044 , η p 2 = 0.068), with a moderate effect size, and zero was not included within the 95% confidence interval for the difference.
The effect of WfH group walks in green corridor environments was marginally significant (β = 0.15, p = 0.05). 3.2.2.
At 30 min, an almost significant difference was only found for the at-rest measurement ( p = 0.05, chi-squared). 3.4.
The relationship is marginally significant for xylene/ethylbenzene ( p -value = 0.120), while the association between toluene and respiratory function is more highly significant ( p -value = 0.050).
Conversely, the increase in the surfactant concentration did not promote a significant trend to the zeta potential of the SLNs ( p < 0.05), which presented negative surface charge with values of −15 to −10 mV.
borderline non-significantp > 0.05
Finally, a post hoc power calculation was performed, and type-II error rate was added for borderline non-significant results (0.1 > p > 0.05). 3.
variegatus showed a highly significant correlation with DFS ( r = −0.36 and r = 0.29, respectively, P < 0.05).
There was a weakly significant interaction between time and MPSS ( p = 0.05) ( Table 4 ).
Lastly, consumption of cereal most or all days was protective of asthma (OR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.45–0.99), although borderline significant ( p = 0.05).