Barely Significant

Excerpts

7,030 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Whether the child was born in or immigrated to Canada was also highly significant in the unadjusted model ( p = 0.002); children born in Canada spent an average of 8.0 h (95% CI = 7.5–8.5 h/week) playing outdoors per week, while newcomer children spent less, an average of only 6.2 h (95% CI = 5.2–7.2 h/week) per week.
a significant trendp = 0.0020.0× alphagold
In addition, comparing ferritin levels by tertiles for boys, there were significant differences between the first and second tertile, β = −0.3 (−0.55, −0.05), and the first and third tertile, β = −0.37 (−0.6, −0.14), with a significant trend ( p = 0.002).
borderline significantp < 0.0030.1× alphagold
Post-intervention, clinicians were more likely to report using the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test most commonly for first-trimester screening (although the change was borderline significant on multivariable analysis: baseline 50%, post-intervention 74%, crude p < 0.003; multivariable adjusted p = 0.06).
marginal significancep -value = 0.0040.1× alphagold
In general, concentrations of most antibiotics were lower in the effluent samples compared to influent samples, with differences (at marginal significance) between influent and effluent concentrations observed only for oxacillin (W = 54, p -value = 0.004) and pipemidic acid (W = 53, p -value = 0.006).
moderately significantp = 0.0050.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The interaction terms Time X Condition were moderately significant for challenge ( b = 0.51, p = 0.005, d = 0.60) and marginally significant for resources ( b = 0.27, p = 0.059, d = 0.39), but not threat ( b = −0.18, p = 0.179, d = 0.28).
clearly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualified
Regarding Hematocrit (percentage volume occupied by red blood cells in relation to total blood volume) through analysis with ANOVA, the Genotype effect was clearly significant (F[1,16] = 9.8; p = 0.006): in WT group there was a positive percentage variation (+4.91% ± 4.29) compared to DATHET group, which showed a negative percentage variation (−8.88% ± 2.52).
markedly significantp = 0.0080.2× alphaqualified
Considering duration of “Floating” during the second session of afternoon, Time * Treatment interaction was markedly significant (F[1,16] = 9.1; p = 0.008): regardless of genotype, control groups carried out floating similarly in the first and the second half session (21.2 ± 17.93); instead treatment with Moringa increased duration of floating in the second period of test (47.3 ± 11.98).
marginally significantp = 0.0080.2× alphagold
In the path model, “Active coping” and “Avoidance coping” had significant or marginally significant associations with “exercise habits” (active: β = 0.19, p = 0.008, avoidance: β = −0.12, p = 0.088), and psychological distress (active: β = −0.25, p < 0.001, avoidance: β = 0.363, p < 0.001).