Excerpts

Additionally, in the between group comparison there was a borderline significant difference between the simple story versus the rebuttal story groups for their perceived scientific value of the story (t(66) = 1.972, p = 0.0528) when corrected for the RPBS scores ( Table 14 ). 6.

Although Axes 1 and 2 were constrained, Axis 2 was marginally significant (F-ratio = 6.74, p = 0.053) ( Table 4 ).

However, between-group comparisons found differences in reaction time for the “faces_recent condition (U = 77.00, p < 0.035) and two marginally significant differences for the faces_old (U = 82.00, p < 0.053) and places_old conditions (U = 82.00, p < 0.053).

In the conversion group, there may be a decreasing trend in Aβ levels compared to baseline after a 2-year follow-up ( P = 0.053), while there was no significant change in tau and P-tau (all P > 0.05).

For T2–T1, there is a marginally significant difference (p = 0.053), with the order as follows: HH group (Mean = 1.38, SD = 0.79) ≈ HN group (Mean = 1.37, SD = 0.87) > NN group (Mean = 0.97, SD = 0.53).

LSA levels is only marginally significant, F (1, 81) = 3.86, p = .053, η p 2 = 0.05, when we do not take into account the differentiation between facets of affective empathy (concern vs. distress).

Translation explained only 3.6% additional variance after lexical inference was controlled for, but the effect was marginally significant ( p = .054).

The RFS positive group included fewer children who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) exposed (had a negative PCR test but whose mother was positive) than the RFS negative group but the difference was not quite significant (p = 0.054).

Further, a significant trend was observed in the downstream DG [t (12) = 2.137, p = 0.054] and VR MPFC [p = 0.053].

Factor X 1 may be significant (p = 0.054) but is less critical, while the remaining factor interactions and quadratic effects of X 1 have no significant effect on the treatment process (p > 0.05).

BMI was relatively higher in males than in females with borderline significance (P = 0.054), and the thickness of the SSP muscle in males was higher (P < 0.001 in both dominant and nondominant arms). 3.2.

Other measures of pulmonary function approached significance (percent predicted FEV 1 , p = 0.054) or were significant (percent predicted FVC, p = 0.047), showing decreased pulmonary function when MDR bacteria was present in the corresponding respiratory sample.

Moreover, hK7 down-regulation also seems to be quite significant in case of invasive ductal carcinoma patients (p = 0.0541).

Similarly, when gender, Chinese tests, and English tests were added as covariates, most of the significant interaction effects between Language and Group Type for N170 amplitude remained significant, and only one interaction effect became marginally significant ( p = 0.055) when using Chinese tests as a covariate.

10.3, p = 0.013) and a trend towards significance for higher AFI (4.3 vs. 4.1, p = 0.055).

Gefitinib showed a trend of longer mPFS in L858R cohort than in 19Del cohort (27.5 months vs. 10.3 months, P = 0.056).

In the univariate analysis, higher blood white blood cell (WBC) counts showed a numerical trend towards a higher probability of being associated with historical peritonitis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.000, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.000–1.001, p = 0.056).

In the brominated pools, the pH did not reach any statistical significance; conductivity only showed a positive and significant correlation with the THMs; and turbidity showed a positive and significant correlation with the HAAs, and close to the limit of significance (p = 0.056) with the HANs.

Engaging in occasional exercise was associated with a reduced risk (HR = 0.53,95%CI: 0.28, 0.99, P = 0.047), and Having symptoms of tuberculosis showed a trend towards an increased risk (HR = 2.37, 95%CI: 0.98, 5.75, P = 0.056).

Follow-up tests indicated a marginally significant interaction effect for identified regulation ( F (1, 413) = 3.67, p = .056, partial ƞ 2 = .01).

This trend seemed most pronounced with soybean and pea protein where the effect of fat source was only marginally non-significant (p = 0.056 and p = 0.060, resp.).

A trend toward significance (p = 0,056) was observable on a measure of narrative organization (i.e.

Behavioral data Emotional experience intensity rating scores were analyzed using a 2 (group: deaf student group/typical hearing control group) × 3 (condition: neutral/cognitive reappraisal/expression suppression) repeated-measures ANOVA which revealed a marginally significant main effect of group ( F (1, 55) = 3.823, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.065), whereby the deaf student group ( M = 4.790, SD = 0.334) was associated with a larger emotional intensity score than the control group ( M = 3.889, SD = 0.317) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.

3 C; P = 0.003 and 0.0006, respectively), whereas that of GR was marginally significant (P = 0.056).

Based on MyPlate guidelines, in general, for “Pattern I ”, the participant in Q4 had a significantly higher intake of grain (6.38 ± 0.21oz-e; p < 0.001), dairy (0.43 ± 0.02c; p < 0.001), protein (8.35 ± 0.25oz-e; p < 0.001), and it was almost significant for vegetables (0.77 ± 0.04c; p = 0.056) in comparison to Q1 participants (grain = 4.56 ± 0.19 oz-e; dairy = 0.24 ± 0.03c; vegetables = 0.62 ± 0.05c; and protein = 3.05 ± 0.15 oz-e).