Excerpts

There was an almost significant 7 four-way interaction of all the factors involved in the experiment (i.e., congruency × visual field × SOA × gender), F (3,174) = 2.36, p = 0.073, η p 2 = 0.04.

In the case of PEP this resulted in a significant main effect of stability, F (1,64) = 6.18, p = 0.026; η p 2 = 0.075, which was qualified by a marginally significant interaction between power and stability, F (1,64) = 3.31, p = 0.074; η p 2 = 0.049.

However, a marginally significant relationship was observed between the probability of a hit and age [ F (1,30) = 3.43, P = 0.074], indicating that performance decreased proportionally with age.

The interaction between age and word frequency was marginally significant, F (4, 137) = 2.18, p = 0.074, η 2 = 0.06, but no other interaction approached significance, F s < 1.86, p s > 0.12.

Three a-priori comparisons of these means with Shaffer control for alpha inflation revealed marginally significant differences between little and medium levels of technicality, Δ M = 0.31, σ = 0.16, t = 1.96, p = 0.074, and between little and high levels of technicality, Δ M = 0.37, σ = 0.16, t = 2.25, p = 0.074.

However, FI showed a marginally significant main effect of the website version [ F (2, 91) = 2.67, p = 0.074].

The three-way interaction just failed to reach significance [ F (1,19) = 2.434, p = 0.074].

Planned post-hoc analyses revealed that mean N400 amplitude for identity prime-target pairs was reduced relative to unrelated prime-target pairs across all regions, i.e., at frontal, t (15) = 2.23, p = 0.042, d = 0.25, fronto-central, t (15) = 2.95, p = 0.01, d = 0.37, and central t (15) = 2.46, p = 0.026, d = 0.43, regions, and approached significance for the centro-parietal region, t (15) = 1.92, p = 0.074, d = 0.48.

In turn, economic worry ( β = 0.1, p = 0.001) significantly predicted depression levels, and health worry predicted depression levels in a marginally significant manner ( β = 0.06, p = 0.074).

Finally, there was a marginal trend for geminate fricatives to have a lower mean Harmonic-to-Noise ratio (HNR) than singleton fricatives (0.8 < 4.0 dB), t (14) = 1.91, p = 0.074, i.e., to be “noisier.” The same trend was found with the vowel preceding /t:/ compared to /t/ (9.7 < 12.7 dB), t (22) = 1.93, p = 0.063.

The correlation between SCR-a and perceived intensity was marginally significant only after controlling for the perceived pleasantness of the odors ( N = 7, r = −0.768, P = 0.074) and significant after controlling for ratings of familiarity ( N = 7, r = −0.823, P = 0.044) indicating that SCR-a increased with the perceived intensity of an odor.

Wilcoxon tests for both DASS Anxiety ( z = −2.53, p = 0.011) and DASS Stress ( z = −2.62, p = 0.009) showed significant decreases in Median values over time, whereas the decreasing values for DASS Depression only approached significance ( z = −1.79, p =0.074).

A marginal trend suggested that older participants scored higher on Perceived Social Addiction ( M = 2.15 vs. 2.03), t = −1.79, p = 0.074.

The correlation between observed and predicted AU2ROC is positive and statistically significant only for the MP ( Figure 7A , r = 0.36, P = 0.0232) while it is not statistically significant for the QSR ( Figure 7C , r = 0.06, P = 0.7233) and only marginally significant for the SCR ( Figure 7B , r = 0.29, P = 0.0741).

The main effect of probe type was marginally significant [ F (1, 144) = 3.21, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.02].

In regression analyses, ART was the only significant predictor of performance in the Lexical Stress task by children with SLI, although sensitivity to sound frequency approached significance as a predictor ( p = 0.075).

The results showed a marginally significant interaction between time and group [ F (1,64) = 3.286, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.050]; this result supported the second hypothesis that students from the experimental group improved more on creativity than those from the control group ( Table 2 ).

The one-way ANOVA was marginally significant, F (3,87) = 2.38, p = 0.075, η p 2 = 0.08.

However the interaction of cue type, dimension and movement type, was marginally significant, F (1, 17) = 3.6, p < 0.075.

A chi-square analysis showed these effects in the proportion of children showing ESC in the critical trials to be marginally significant, χ ( 7 ) 2 = 12.89, p = 0.075.

In contrast, the HOC group ( M = 12.48, SD = 5.06) showed a trend toward a higher sense of negative agency compared to the LOC group [( M = 9.64, SD = 2.87), t (22.47) = 1.87, p = 0.075, d = 0.69]. 3.2.3 Explaining implicit sense of agency – regression analysis Tone binding in the HOC group was significantly predicted by OCI-R total scores ( F (1, 13) = 5.53, R 2 = 0.298, p = 0.035; beta = −10.49, t = −2.35, p = 0.035).

While the level of education was not a significant predictor of women’s economic worries ( p > 0.05), it was borderline significant for men ( p = 0.075).

We also found a marginally significant Condition x Test Timing interaction, F (1, 59) = 3.27, p = 0.075, partial η 2 = 0.05.

The results remained almost the same after excluding the wrong answers: the difference between trial types approached significance in the egocentric bias version (experimental: Mdn = −4.38; control: Mdn = 4.53), Z = -1.781, p = 0.075; however, no such pattern has been shown for the altercentric bias condition (experimental: Mdn = −1.24; control: Mdn = 3.09), Z = -1.453, p = 0.146.

In-depth examination using partial correlation analysis, while controlling for age and generalized anxiety, indicated that anxiety and anger under gaming conditions displayed only marginally significant correlations with gaming disorder scores (mean anxiety-disorder score: r = 0.296, p = 0.075; mean anger-disorder score: r = 0.319, p = 0.054).