The ANOVA revealed significant main effects of Condition, [ F (2, 112) = 5.951, p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.10] a marginally significant main effect of Gaze Trial, [ F (3, 168) = 2.35, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.04].
Excerpts
The three-way interaction of Required Response × Gender × Gender Stereotype fell short of significance, F (1, 45) = 3.48, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.07 (see Figure 4 ).
This analysis yielded a main effect of model-based values, b = 0.30, SE = 0.14, t (71.46) = 2.17, p = 0.03, and a marginally significant main effect of model-free values, b = 0.16, SE = 0.09, t (162.97) = 1.82, p = 0.07.
However, the interaction effect between illusion type and the number of repeated auditory stimuli was marginally significant, F (1,26) = 3.52, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.12, which means that the one and two repeated stimuli conditions showed no significant difference for both fission and fusion illusions.
We found marginally significant evidence indicating the hypothesized moderating effect of age on peer influence on STEM-related activities (β = −1.44, SE = 0.97, one-sided p = 0.07).
Regarding theta 2 power, the main effects of time [ F (1,58) = 9.89, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.15], site [ F (3,174) = 33.45, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.37], and condition [ F (3,174) = 39.31, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.40] were observed; importantly, a marginally significant interaction effect of time point × site × condition × group [ F (9,522) = 1.75, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.03] was observed.
The phase relationships at other frequencies were not significant except for a marginally significant difference around 180° ( p = 0.07) at 9.38 Hz.
Intellectual activities had a marginally significant ( p = 0.07) impact on AMT overall: Estimate = 0.084, [−0.007 to 0.17], but did not interact with time.
close to significancep = 0.07
Pairwise comparisons showed that the EG showed significant results between the Baseline and the Acquisition-SQIC condition ( p < 0.0001) and close to significance between the Baseline and the Transfer condition ( p = 0.07). 4.4.
Finally, t -tests found a significant difference between the two groups on the Change scale ( t = 2.73, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.14), and a marginally significant difference on the Success scale ( t = 1.89, p = 0.07, η 2 p = 0.02).
There were some almost significant ( p = 0.07–0.08) trends in some of the variables studied: Social awareness improved in the Latvian student sample in both age groups as well as in Slovenian 8–11-year old student sample.
approached significancep = 0.07
The interaction between the factors was not significant for Opacity, χ 2 (2) = 0.07, p = 0.96, and it approached significance for Oiliness, β Standard = −0.69, SE Standard = 0.32, χ 2 (2) = 5.42, p = 0.07.
For example, parent use of praise per minute was related to parent spatial language per minute, r (31)=0.52, p <0.05, and the relation between parent praise and parent use of persistence-focused language per minute was approaching significance, r (31)=0.33, p =0.07.
Here, we find that the Intentional condition has a marginally significant difference from the Accidental condition [the chi-squared test of proportion; χ 2 (1, n = 68) = 2.89 p = 0.07], and has no significant difference between Intentional and Control conditions [the chi-squared test of proportion; χ 2 (1, n = 71) = 1.0, p = 0.32] nor between Accidental and Control conditions [the chi-squared test of proportion; χ 2 (1, n = 37) = 0.02, p = 0.88].
approached significancep = 0.07
The interaction of Performance with Size approached significance [ F (1,87) = 3.37, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.33].
However, the main effect of span was marginally significant [ F (2, 67) = 2.67, p = 0.07, η 2 =0.19], and there was a significant Elaboration x Span interaction [ F (2, 67) = 3.97, p = 0.05, η 2 =0.23].
However, we found only a marginally significant ( p = 0.07) interaction in the regression model for the RAT.
The results of the one-sided two-sample T -tests are presented as following: the control group, the participants who were simply asked for a donation, donated more than the first treatment group who were offered the tote bag as a thank-you gift ( p = 0.048, mean.c = 28.76, Sd-c = 25.65, mean.t1 = 24.01, Sd.t1 = 25.74); the difference become insignificant when compared to the second treatment group for whom the statement is given ( p = 0.205, mean.c = 28.76, Sd.c = 25.65, mean.t2 = 27.93, Sd.t2 = 25.42); however, the difference between the control groups is only weakly significant ( p = 0.070, mean.t1 = 24.01, Sd.t1 = 25.74, mean.t2 = 27.93, Sd.t2 = 25.42).
INTRO (Model 3) There was a marginally significant age effect ( β = 0.083, SE = 0.046, z = 1.814, p = 0.07; post hoc power = 49%), suggesting a trend in more indefinite nominals (felicitous for INTRO) with increasing age.
Consumption cost had a marginally significant effect on the number of clips [ F (1,71) = 3.36, p = 0.07]: Participants selected slightly more clips in the low-cost condition ( M = 5.59, SD = 2.84) than in the high-cost condition ( M = 4.47, SD = 2.41).
Results showed that the effect size of PATHS at follow-up was 0.10, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.07).
a trend toward significancep = 0.071
In the moderate-fatigue condition, the advantage of external focus further, showing a trend toward significance [ t (29) = 1.86, p = 0.071, d = 0.74].
Although the group × time interaction was only marginally significant ( p = 0.071), exploratory analyses suggested a tendency for larger post-test P3 amplitudes in the Tai Chi training group, particularly for negative and neutral stimuli.
Somatosensory was significantly related to Motor ( z = 3.160, p = 0.008; FDR-corrected) and there was a tendency toward significance with Temperature ( z = 2.194; p = 0.071; FDR-corrected).
close to significancep = 0.071
We also found a stimulus type by length interaction [ F (1,24) = 6.488, p = 0.018, partial μ 2 = 0.213], as the length effect was smaller in pseudowords with consistent graphemes than in pseudowords with context-dependent graphemes; the block by stimulus type was close to significance [ F (1,24) = 3.571, p = 0.071, partial μ 2 = 0.130], indicating that RTs of pseudowords with consistent graphemes decreased more quickly with repeated reading; and a block by length interaction [ F (1,24) = 18.629, p < 0.001, partial μ 2 = 0.437], as the typical readers showed a length effect reduction with the repetitions.