Excerpts

Latent mean comparisons by gender Comparisons of latent means revealed no statistically significant differences between gender across the three SPSI’s subscales, although a marginal trend ( p = 0.061) was observed for low self-stigma, with girls reporting slightly lower self-stigma.

In this experiment, participants in the Pinyin group (mean = 2.53; SD = 0.834) required on average more cycles than did participants in the Zhuyin group (mean = 2.00; SD = 0.655); however, this difference was only marginally significant [ F (1, 28) = 3.797, p = 0.061, partial η 2 = 0.119].

The effect of age approached significance for MTS, F (1,73) = 3.63, p = 0.062.

Positive Affect (PANAS) Results from the positive affect scale of PANAS showed a main effect of age approaching significance, F (1,198) = 3.51, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.02 (BF = 0.76) with young adults having higher scores than older adults.

Furthermore, a trend toward significance was found for the variable “restless sleep” (F = 3.709; df = 1,37; p = 0.062).

No main effects of strategy type were significant for movement duration or average speed ( all adjusted p > 0.10), and although interaction effects approached significance for movement duration [ F (3,1,264) = 2.47, p = 0.062] and average speed [ F (3,1,264) = 2.49, p = 0.060], these too did not survive Bonferroni correction ( p = 1.000 and p = 0.211, respectively).

The main effect of emotional consistency was marginally significant ( F (2,34) = 3.012, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.151).

Additionally, semantic processing had a marginally significant contribution [ b = 0.031, t (46) = 1.92, p = 0.062].

The ANCOVAs showed a significant interaction between ‘time of test’ and ‘arm length’ for the mean velocity [ F (1,14) = 15.12; p = 0.002] and for the peak velocity [ F (1,14) = 9.45; p = 0.008], and a near significance interaction between ‘time of test’ and ‘arm length’ for the mean reached positions [ F (1,14) = 4.10; p = 0.062].

Only compassion ( B = 0.34, P < 0.001) but not perceived discrimination ( B = 0.01, P = 0.696) positively associated with charitable giving (Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.183), while perceived discrimination showed a marginal trend for enhancing the effect of compassion on participation in charitable giving ( B = 0.04, P = 0.062, Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.150).

For the d-prime data, the Part factor was not significant overall F (3, 45) = 2.14, p = 0.11 [It approached significance for the sir-ssir contrast, F (3, 45) = 2.63, p = 0.062].

A repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse–Geisser correction ( ε = 0.617) revealed a main effect of View Content approaching significance, F (1.851, 62.922) = 2.970, p = 0.062, partial η 2 = 0.080.

Statistical Results We observed an almost significant difference between conditions with respect to the change in overall stress, F (2,101) = 2.85, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.053.

There was also a marginally significant effect of SNR, F (1.752,70.060) = 3.010, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.070.

Although the local SN showed a tendency to be lateralized to the left hemisphere, this component was more bilateral than the SN for global distracters and thus only marginally significant ( p = 0.062, Figure 3C and right panel of Figure 6 ).

However, the FIRST score at Post-REB approached significance for the G-hyp group compared to Pre-REB ( p = 0.062).

In the haptic condition , there was a trend toward significance for the main effect of Group [ F (2,25) = 3.11, p = 0.062, η 2 = 0.182].

A mixed effect logistic regression, predicting the likelihood of making this type of error (1, 0) by condition, controlling for time point and problem type revealed that this difference was marginally significant: Children in the action condition made more adding-the-first-two-numbers errors than children in the gesture condition [χ 2 (1) = 3.50, p = 0.062].

The effect of Emotion tended toward significance also in children with ASD (HFA: F ( 2 , 44 ) = 2.97, p = 0.062, η 2 G = 0.05; LFA: F ( 2 , 24 ) = 3.14; p = 0.061, η 2 G = 0.04), therefore exploratory post hoc comparisons were performed also in these groups.

For misophonic participants, the difference between these exposures was marginally significant [U S U V Exposure 4 - Exposure 1: M = −0.052, SE = 0.025, t (13) = 2.04, p = 0.062] but for non-misophonic participants, the mean difference was not significant [U S U V Exposure 4 - Exposure 1: M = −0.003, SE = 0.029, t (13) = 0.11, p = 0.91].

Forward Digit Span = 6.68, Incidental Memorization Task = 1.968, RAVENS = 71.54) revealed a significant difference between the Rate of Transmission conditions (Fast Rate and Slow Rate groups) for the New-syllable XXY [ M = 0.101, SE = 0.045, F (1,213) = 4.936, p = 0.027], and a nearly significant difference for the Familiar-syllable X1X2Y [ M = 0.085, SE = 0.045, F (1,213) = 3.522, p = 0.062].

The two-way interaction of video x phase was not significant when all three video conditions were entered into the ANOVA model, p > 0.17, but it approached significance when the urban video and no video data were combined into a single group for comparison with the nature video condition, F (1, 88) = 3.570, p = 0.062, η p 2 = 0.039.

In addition, the interaction SLEEP × REWARD × AGE showed a trend toward significance [ F (1,34) = 3.7, p = 0.062].

The main effect of Word Length was marginally significant [ F (1, 22) = 3.88, p = 0.062].

Simple effects analyses indicated that compared to low integration, high integration in both the extraverted and introverted groups demonstrated a marginally significant higher level of life satisfaction ( p = 0.062 for extravert and p = 0.067 for introvert).