Excerpts

The interaction between delay interval, age, and educational track showed a trend toward significance [Greenhouse–Geisser F (1.77,1098.32) = 2.34, p = 0.06].

Sample size had a significant effect on effect size ( p = 0.0394) and age had a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.0603).

The main effect of Day just failed significance, F (1, 23) = 3.87, p = 0.061, η 2 p = 0.14.

In contrast, TD children also showed a significant difference between overt pronouns and null pronouns ( p < 0.001), as well as subject DPs ( p < 0.001), but the difference between null pronouns and subject DPs was approaching significance ( p = 0.061), a consequence of the fact that the TD children used more null subjects than subject DPs.

A statistical trend was also found of a marked increase in the ability to teach and instruct skills to players in the post-intervention evaluation in the experimental group ( p = 0.061), while no variation was observed in the control group.

Similarly, the interaction between Dyslipidemia and Social activities is marginally significant ( β = 0.15, p = 0.061), indicating a potential reinforcing effect of social engagement on health care consumption behavior among individuals with dyslipidemia (see Table 6 for details). 4.

The path analysis revealed that allopregnanolone exerted a significant direct effect on frontal cortex SERT binding (standardized estimate -0.321, p = 0.034) and a borderline significant effect on reaction latency (standardized estimate -0.179, p = 0.061).

A pair-wise comparison showed that RC ( p = 0.007) was significantly different from NB while VC was marginally significant ( p = 0.061).

There was a trend toward significance when comparing the +A+M mean voice key latencies with those of the +C+M condition [ t (37) = –1.585, p = 0.061].

VC was not significantly different from VCI ( p = 0.164) but had significant difference from VCOI ( p < 0.001), while VCI and VCOI showed a trend towards a significant difference ( p = 0.061).

The results were not significant, but they showed a trend that supported sub-hypothesis 2 ( U = 445, p = 0.061, n spontaneous = 28, n forced = 26, PS = 0.61, 95% CIs of medians [0.024, 0.097] ( spontaneous ) and [0.0, 0.0] ( forced )) ( Figure 3D ).

Analyses revealed a marginally significant interaction between framing and political affiliation on one’s motivation to participate in the drive [ F (1, 249) = 3.55, p = 0.061].

Prevention, however, emerged as a near-significant negative predictor ( β = -0.17, p = 0.061).

While there was no significant effect of age ( β = −0.070, p = 0.624), there was a marginally significant age × culture interaction ( β = −0.270, p = 0.061), indicating that developmental changes in context sensitivity differed across cultural contexts.

In this experiment, participants in the Pinyin group (mean = 2.53; SD = 0.834) required on average more cycles than did participants in the Zhuyin group (mean = 2.00; SD = 0.655); however, this difference was only marginally significant [ F (1, 28) = 3.797, p = 0.061, partial η 2 = 0.119].

The interaction between cueing and congruency approached significance, [ F (1, 18) = 4.01, p = 0.061, η 2 p = 0.18], with the congruency effect being larger for uncued trials (202 ms) than for cued trials (167 ms).

The intercept term of the model was marginally significant ( p = 0.061).

Concerning ratings of frequency and preference of use, although they were close to the mid-point of the 1 to 7 scale (1 = ‘only Catalan,’ 7 = ‘only Spanish’), they were slightly biased toward both using and preferring Catalan over Spanish ( M = 3.63, SD = 1.03, Minimum = 2.00, Maximum = 6.50, Range = 4.50, for frequency of use, and M = 3.51, SD = 1.32, Minimum = 1.00, Maximum = 5.75, Range = 4.75, for preference of use, respectively), although one-sampled t -tests revealed that the difference with respect to the mid-point of the scale was only marginally significant ( p = 0.061 and p = 0.050 for frequency and preference, respectively).

The effect of Condition approached significance, F (1, 173) = 3.56, p = 0.061, η p 2 = 0.02: Participants in the Feedback group ( M = 0.58, SE = 0.02) used DK slightly more than those in the No Feedback group ( M = 0.52, SE = 0.02).

The AQ was a near-significant coefficient, t = −1.903, p = 0.061 whereas the SQ was non-significant, p = 0.919.

On the one hand, socioeconomic status was positively related to parenthood disposition (β = 0.28, t = 3.95, p < 0.001), but its direct effect on long-term mating orientation only reached a statistical trend (β = 0.13, t = 1.88, p = 0.061).

Regarding the benefits of PEB, there was a marginally significant interaction effect between pro-environmental attitude and type of estimation ( b = −0.02 CI 95% [−0.03, 0.00], p = 0.061; model statistics: F (2819) = 3.13, p = 0.025).

The effect of perceived algorithmic evaluation on organizational dehumanization was essentially unchanged (b = 0.39, p < 0.001 ), and the perceived algorithmic evaluation × proactive personality interaction retained the same direction and a comparable magnitude (b = −0.23); it became marginally significant ( p = 0.061), consistent with the loss of degrees of freedom from several sparsely populated role categories.

Additionally, at posttest, the response of TG to auditory stimulus was significantly faster compared to the CG [ t (29) = 1.942, p = 0.026, d = 0.590], while the response to visual stimulus showed a trend toward faster responses [ t (29) = 1.187, p = 0.061, d = 0.427] that did not reach statistical significance.

Furthermore, central to our hypothesis, a marginally significant Load × Group interaction effect was found, F (2, 27) = 3.1, p = 0.061 (see Figure 3 ).