Excerpts

Also, there was a slightly significant main effect in the negative arousal condition, F (3,69) = 2.641, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.103, again the hit rate for happy faces being higher than for neutral expressions ( p = 0.038).

However, there were no significant differences between groups [χ 2 (1) < 1, p = 0.879], and the interaction just missed significance [χ 2 (1) = 3.6, p = 0.056].

Additionally, self-concept indirectly mediates the relationship between resilience and Mark (β = 0.02, p = 0.004), and the indirect mediating relationship between emotional intelligence and mark is very close to significance (β = 0.01 p = 0.056).

When the data in the IRLP and IRLV conditions were analyzed (removing the data from the REG condition), however, the priming advantage for morphological over orthographic primes was not quite statistically significant, F (1, 2801.7) = 3.66 , p = 0.056.

The main effect of emotional valence approached significance [ β = 0.107, t = 1.913, p = 0.056, 95% CI = (−0.003, 0.217)], suggesting a marginal tendency for reaction times to differ between positive and negative words.

However this was mitigated by a marginally significant interaction by group [group × change, F (1, 30) = 3.969, p = 0.056], such that this effect was observed in tone speakers ( p < 0.001) but not in the control group ( p = 0.215).

The correlation between chronological age and right-hand use in the grasp-to-construct task approached significance ( r = 0.16; p = 0.056).

However, there was a marginally significant difference between the first and second mapping, t (28) = 2.00, p = 0.056, d = 0.371, suggesting that children used MEB to a lesser degree on the second mapping.

With regard to brand recall , the mediation analyses showed a marginally significant direct effect of the disclosure on brand recall ( b = 1.72, SE = 0.90, p = 0.056).

The correlation approached significance in channel 44, r (21) = -0.403, p = 0.056.

600–1,000 ms Analyses of this time window indicated the main effect of electrode sites was approaching significance [ F (2,36) = 3.134, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.148], with the largest LPC amplitude in parietal Pz (3.6 μV), significantly larger than those in frontal Fz (2.6 μV, p < 0.05) and central Cz (2.6 μV, p < 0.05).

Patients in both groups showed highly significant improvements in interoceptive awareness with the Feldenkrais group being slightly better than the Back School group ( p = 0.056).

The curvature of the LOIC was marginally significant [a4 = 0.14, 95% CI (−0.004, 0.277), p = 0.056], suggesting that whether adolescents or parents hold high educational expectations is related to better parent–child relationships as reported by parents (see Figure 2B ).

The interaction effect between input mode and text difficulty was marginally significant, F (1, 58) = 3.81, p = 0.056, indicating that in general, insertions made by the dictation group were more sensitive to text difficulty than those made by the typing group. 4.3.2.

Similarly to the first eight-item model, this seven-item model was rejected because its chi-square value was nearly significant [ x 2 (11) = 19.270, p = 0.056; x 2 /df = 1.751].

Additionally, the interaction effect between emotionality and word type was marginally significant, F (1, 35) = 3.913, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.101.

It is possible that our sample size was simply too small to determine any effects, which could be indicated by the effect of therapeutic factors on self-efficacy in the following session showing borderline significance ( p = 0.056).

The main effect for the requested movement was marginally significant, F (1,82) = 3.76, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.044.

(3) Regression analysis to test the effect of visuospatial WM on error rate learning slope while controlling for math anxiety (path b) was only marginally significant, R 2 = 0.23, F (2,22) = 3.30, p = 0.056 (cf.

While the delayed effects of MFSS on school adjustment only reached marginally significant statistical level from MFSS at wave 3 ( p = 0.056), its concurrent effects of wave 5 and 6 were found to be significant (βs = 0.10, p s < 0.001).

We find the effect is borderline significant ( p = 0.056).

The expected Target × Dimension × Condition interaction was marginally significant, F (1,116) = 3.72, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.03.

Indeed, post-hoc paired t -tests showed a trend for better performance in the FM-ir condition than FM or FM-i conditions, t (23) = 2.01, p < 0.056 and t (23) = 1.95, p < 0.063, respectively.

There was also a nearly statistically significant linear trend ( p = 0.056) showing a higher prevalence of alexithymic in single patients compared to patients with partner and separated/divorced/widow ( Table 1 ).

Significant correlations were obtained between the percentages of immediate choices and mean N2 peak amplitudes of all conditions on FCz ( r = -0.415, p = 0.011) and nearly significant correlation on mean of all selected electrodes ( r = -0.205, p = 0.056), indicating that the N2 amplitudes over the frontal region may predict individual’s choice.