Excerpts

In separate analyses of each outcome variable, the interaction term was significant or near-significant in all four cases (chocolate: B = 0.93, 95% CI −0.01–1.87, t = 1.95, p = 0.05; crackers: B = 1.22, 95% CI 0.35–2.09, t = 2.78, p = 0.006; crisps: B = 1.43, 95% CI 0.57–2.28, t = 3.31, p = 0.001; popcorn: B = 1.25, 95% CI 0.29–2.21, t = 2.58, p = 0.01).

Women who binge eat displayed negative correlations between self-reported motor impulsiveness score and accuracy rates in different conditions (HHH: r = -0.41, p = 0.02; LHL: r = -0.46, p = 0.01; LLL: r = -0.47, p = 0.01), though a marginally significant correlation was observed (HLH: r = -0.35, p = 0.05).

There was a marginally significant difference in T2 PTSD symptoms ( t [164] = 1.97, p = 0.05), with those participating at both times reporting lower symptom levels ( M = 32.64, SD = 16.93) compared to those who only participated at T2 ( M = 39.16, SD = 19.48).

(2) The degree of political involvement in social networking is negatively related to PWB (H2 does not hold); its effect value was 0.21 ( t = 1.91, p < 0.05), i.e., the more often people participate in political discussions and share relevant information in social networking platforms, the less positive feeling about their life, socialization, and satisfaction or well-being; however, this effect was weakly significant ( p < 0.05).

However, gender stereotype endorsement (GSE; Model 2) was found to differentially predict the trait-state discrepancy based on gender as stated in Hypothesis 3: This discrepancy was positively predicted by GSE for girls (γ 120 = 0.21, p < 0.001), whereas for boys the effect of GSE was negative and marginally significant (γ 120 = −0.09, p = 0.05).

The anterior cingulate-dorsal prefrontal-angular gyri network (ICN10) in the TCC group also showed a trend of significantly decreased fALFF relative to the control group ( F = 4.108; p = 0.05).

This result remained significant when restricted to the 14 children who used HoW as the unfamiliar book (85.7% chose familiar, 2-tailed p = 0.01) and was marginally significant when restricted to the 27 children who used HP-UK as the unfamiliar book (70.4%, 2-tailed p = 0.05).

Although the model for motivation did not reach significance, χ 2 (5) = 9.11, p = 0.11, the interaction between theory of mind and interpretation of the praise approached significance, B = −0.38, Wald = 3.80, p = 0.05.

Again, males have a worst perception (M = 63.66, SD = 27.73) than females (M = 67.95, SD = 26.16), although the difference is barely significant ( t = −1.59, df = 646, p = 0.05, d = 0.12).

The difference approached significance for inhibition time and errors on the NEPSY-II, t (74) = 2.00, p = 0.05 and t (74) = 1.96, p = 0.05 (see Table 3 ).

A significant trend was only seen at 8 years of age (χ 2 = 5.892, p = 0.05), and there were no significant differences between the three apparatus at 10 years of age (χ 2 = 2.722, p = NS).

This is because, in other parts of the DMN, we found a highly significant effect of age in posterior-ventral PCC during semantic matching ( x = −18 y = −68 z = 20, z -score = 5.2; at p < 0.05 FWE-corrected), with greater deactivations for younger than older subjects.

However, the path from body surveillance to body dissatisfaction failed to attain significance ( p < 0.05).

Additionally, the difference of implicit aggression between high empathy and low empathy conditions approached significance in the justified- role play condition ( p = 0.05).

Results revealed a significant effect of sensation seeking (β = 0.23, t = 2.79, p = 0.006, r p = 0.23), a marginally significant effect of condition (β = 0.16, t = 1.96, p = 0.05, r p = 0.17), and a significant Condition × Sensation Seeking interaction (β = 0.17, t = 2.04, p = 0.04, r p = 0.17), depicted in Figure 1 .

As the sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics were weakly correlated [i.e., coefficients of Pearson's correlation were lower than 0.5 and highly significant ( p < 0.05); see Supplementary material for full results], they were included as controls variables in our econometric analysis.

The results revealed a significant group by cue interactions for the VG group versus the CC group, F (1,29) = 6.86, p = 0.014; for the VS group versus the CC group, F (1,28) = 17.71, p < 0.001; but the interaction marginally failed to reach significance for the VP group versus the CC group, F (1,28) = 4.06, p = 0.05.

Results indicated that no significant associations between PSS-4 scores and any of the category-specific parental descriptors of rewards or challenges, with the exception of a marginally significant Spearman correlation coefficient between parental references to safety challenges and PSS-4 scores, r = 0.158, p = 0.05.

The amnesic patients were at least 2 SD lower than the healthy comparison participants’ mean (1846: 2.10 SD, 2363: 3.10 SD, 2563: 3.30 SD), a difference that was marginally significant [ z (4)=1.96, p =.05].

In the TOGETHER condition, there was a significant correlation of TB effect with S1 ( ρ = 0.49, p = 0.03), and a close-to-significant correlation of TB effect with S2 ( ρ = 0.46, p = 0.05).

The tests revealed a near-significant difference in three-day average PM 2.5 readings between Round 1 and Round 2 ( Z = −1.96; p = 0.05), and no differences in three cognitive measures: working memory ( Z = −1.13; p = 0.26), inhibitory control ( Z = −1.52; p = 0.10), and arithmetic ( Z = −0.87; p = 0.39).

An additional regression analysis conducted on 50% of bilingual children with highest weighted exposure and on matched monolingual peers revealed a main effect of Age ( p < 0.01), but only a marginally significant effect of Group ( p = 0.05), and no interaction of Group and Age ( p = 0.89).

A two-way mixed-design ANOVA revealed a marginally significant interaction between the type of article (Martian life vs. synthetic life) and affect (positive vs. negative), F (1,503) = 3.73, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.007, such that reactions of those in the Martian life condition showed a stronger positivity bias than reactions of those in the synthetic life condition.

Moreover, the percentage of penalized trials showed a near-significant negative correlation with age (ρ = −0.263, p = 0.050).

Subsequent paired-samples t -tests indicated that there was a significant increase in premature responding over sessions for Hole B [ t (9) = 3.0, p = 0.01] and a marginally significant increase for Hole C [ t (9) = 2.3, p = 0.05].