Excerpts

Thus these 14 items were found to display practically significant DIF effects.

Fourth, the diagnosis or symptom of COVID-19 of the participants may be significant moderators which was not assessed in this study.

According to the directions, when the correlation coefficient between variables is >0.5, the correlation is considered to be significant; when the correlation coefficient between variables is >0.8, the correlation is considered to be highly significant.

There was a weak trend for a three-way interaction between age, object presence, and cue condition, which raises issues of power and whether the sample size was sufficient to detect age differences in the magnitude of the two forms of IOR.

Interestingly, the association between Gloria’s dominance and withdrawal ruptures changed from being significant to marginally significant, indicating that the associations between dominance and withdrawal ruptures were perhaps stronger for Ellis than for Gloria.

All single IES-R and thermometer variables showed post-EMDR highly significant changes in delta scores albeit with differences between one and the other ( Table 3 ).

The direct effect of boredom on time remained highly significant.

Authentically pluralistic and inclusive research that involves collaboration, co-production and dialogue is more likely to occur in situations in which a programme of research is organised around a social goal that is sufficiently broad and practically significant, and whose relevance is sufficiently widely acknowledged to energise the passion, active involvement and passion of individuals and groups beyond the academic community.

Repeated rhymes occurring at the end of phrase three to ten of the songs elicited a central negativity within the first 200 ms after pseudo-word onset, which was marginally significant when corrected for multiple comparisons.

Instead, there was a marginally significant indirect effect linking first-generation college status background to the frequency of all components of home-school cultural value mismatch through the mediating variable of collectivistic motives (events and time with family: unstandardized indirect effect = 0.12; standardized indirect effect = 0

Through my analysis of 15 originals and 18 American remakes, from the 1930s to the 2010s, I found a clear trend.

However, of those three, only voter turnout remained modestly significant in the multiple regression analyses.

That is, for non-viewpoint markers, Egocentric Intrusion had a numerically positive, near-significant effect on rereading rate, and this effect was significantly more positive for cognitive viewpoint markers.

Absurd ( t = −1.99) marginally significant, such that the Correct collocations yielded a more positive peak than the Absurd.

We observe that whistleblowing is indeed marginally significant in decreasing ingroup contributions in the gift exchange game.

Although most of the results fell short of significance, the reported effect sizes align with the medium to small effect sizes reported in other resilience and positive psychology interventions in similar contexts (e.g., Davis et al., 2016 ; Houston et al., 2017 ; Hill et al., 2018 ; Akeman et al., 2020 ; Armenta et al., 2020 ; Linz et al., 2020 ).

A generally accepted rule of thumb is to accept an item with a standardized factor loading of 0.70 ( Fornell and Larcker, 1981 ) with a two-tailed p ≤ 0.05, while a standardized factor loading of 0.50 ( p ≤ 0.05, two-tailed test) is considered practically significant for exploratory research.

We observe the existence of highly significant, inversely proportional, bidirectional correlations between the Listening, observation skills of Intercultural Competence dimensions, and the Engagement and Accomplishment subscales.

However, there was no clarity and correlation between the severity of ASD and the type of session nor there was a clear trend between duration, frequency, intensity and progress made by children.

Second, for transactional leadership, results indicate that cultural distance is positively related to self-ratings ( b = 0.012, p < 0.10, column 4), and negatively related to other-ratings of transactional leadership ( b = –0.012, p < 0.10, column 5) at a marginal significance level.

That is, except for a marginally significant interaction effect on self-other agreement of transactional leadership for the 30% vs. 70% subsample, cultural distance effects were significant across all subsamples.

In total, 200 respondents reported an increasing PTG trend and approach coping (active coping, planning, positive reframing, acceptance, emotional support, and instrumental support) and a decreasing trend of avoidant coping (self-distraction and denial) over time.

With an alpha level of p = 0.10 the results revealed no statistical significance but a weak trend toward the external attentional focus yielding marginally better performance.

The two variables had the interaction effect [ F (1,76) = 3.902, p = 0.052 (marginal significance)].

The process model retains highly significant events; less significant but highly correlated events are aggregated into clusters.