Excerpts

However, the strength of this association was reduced and only marginally significant ( p < 0.10) when preference for the equity principle, gender, and academic unit were added to the equation.

For all analyses, an alpha level of p < 0.05 was used as criterion for significance, but marginally significant findings (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) regarding experimental manipulations are also reported and explored because of a priori predictions with these factors.

However, correlations of ethos ratings with national character stereotypes were significant and substantial (0.46–0.61) for three of the cultures, and showed a trend ( r = 0.32, p < 0.10) for Russia.

The same pattern emerged in sample 2, though the difference was only marginally significant at p < 0.10 for psychosomatic complaints (M ls – M lc = −0.41, SE = 0.09, p < 0.001 for irritation; M ls – M lc = −0.22, SE = 0.09, p = 0.066 for psychosomatic complaints; M ls – M lc = 0.29, SE = 0.08, p = 0.001 for self-rated health).

We also found a significant trend between the mean scores of the SFA and Control groups in the post-2 ( Figure 3B , p < 0.10).

For Orbic muscle activation, the only finding that was approaching significance was that greater change in Orbic activity was associated with greater general NM (ß = 0.18, p < 0.10, R 2 = 0.03, F (1, 121) = 3.79, p = 0.054), indicating that those higher in general NM were incorrectly activating muscles around their eyes when intentionally mimicking a neutral face.

For low RetirPlan, an unexpected increase in RetirIntent was also observed, although it was only marginally significant [ F (1,203) = 2.72, p = 0.10].

The Number of Dominant Images A marginally significant association was found between “The number of dominant images” and the two groups of families ( χ 2 = 3.68, p < 0.10).

Planned pairwise comparisons confirmed that parameter R was significantly increased for red exemplars compared to blue [χ 2 (1) = 18.02, p < 0.001] and green exemplars [χ 2 (1) = 27.76, p < 0.001], and there was a slight trend for R being higher for red compared to yellow exemplars [χ 2 (1) = 2.71, p = 0.100].

Conservation) was only marginally significant ( p < 0.1, t = 1.7).

R-square increase by 3.2% due to interaction term is marginally significant, F (2, 133) = 2.31, p = 0.10.

These results show that trust has a negative impact on anxiety but is weakly significant from a statistical viewpoint (β = −0.139, p < 0.10).

In line with H5, we observe a marginally significant interaction effect of error risk taking and perceived organizational innovation climate (β = 0.16, p < 0.1, 95% CI [−0.00, 0.32]).

The effect of product type × reward type was significant [ F (1, 288) = 12.99, p < 0.001]; that of product type × gender was insignificant [ F (1, 288) = 0.26, ns]; and that of reward type × gender was marginally significant [ F (1, 288) = 3.85, p < 0.1].

When controlling for age, however, only the relation between Working Memory and the 3-option modified Contents False Belief task remained marginally significant ( r = 0.19, p < 0.10).

Yet, only marginally significant mediation effects were examined for Reading (Model 4 in Table 4 ) with students' school identification ( b = 7.15, p < 0.10) and their perceptions of school climate (indirect effect, b = 7.87, p < 0.10).

The study had a relatively small sample size and may have been underpowered, several effects were only marginally significant ( p < 0.10), and the physiological changes emerged during a brief 15-min interaction and began returning toward baseline by the end of the session.

The overall CSE was only marginally significant (previous × current trial congruency interaction: F [1, 9] = 3.3, p = 0.10), with numerically smaller conflict scores following incongruent (mean = 80 ms) than congruent trials (mean = 60 ms) (see Figure 3 A).

Of the low-level visual variables, color similarity (brightness histograms across the various color channels) was significant in the recognition task, and vertical spectral amplitude approached significance on the location task ( p < 0.1).

As can be seen in the figure, children showed significant shape responding for the clay, M = 0.64, t (74) = 5.16, p < 0.0001, and wood sets, M = 0.68, t (73) = 5.90, p < 0.0001, and marginally significant shape responding for the sand, M = 0.56, t (73) = 1.89, p < 0.10, and Styrofoam sets, M = 0.55, t (74) = 1.76, p < 0.10.

Furthermore, when examining the relationship with the Type I criterion separately for absent responses and present responses ( Sherman et al., 2018 ), a positive relationship emerges between mean confidence for absent responses and c ( r = 0.25, p < 0.05), along with a strong trend toward a negative association between mean confidence for present responses and c ( r = −0.15, p = 0.10), thereby replicating Sherman et al.’s findings.

However, the indirect effect of individualism on promoting hygiene and cleaning through affective attitude and feeling of risk was marginally significant ( p < 0.10) based on unadjusted estimates.

Similarly, significance was always stated at p < 0.05 (while p < 0.1 was considered as a statistical trend). 3.

Significant differences ( p < 0.05) were found on the face-name task, ALT, word updating task and backward digit span, and marginally significant difference ( p < 0.1) was found on the picture updating task.

Fathers’ reported hours of involvement at Wave 1 were associated with greater self-regulation in the gift wrap task at Wave 2 at a level that was approaching significance ( r = 0.14, p < 0.10).