Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,349 sentences · 1 filter applied

only marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
In our model-based analysis ( Supplementary Table 5 ), the biocrust type treatment was only marginally significant ( p = 0.08), and the only significant pairwise difference between treatments was for moss-lichen biocrusts (μ ± 1 SD = 0.004 ± 0.002 nmol N 2 O m –2 s –1 , n = 20) vs. control samples (difference ± 1 SE = 0.0011 ± 0.0005 nmol N 2 O m –2 s –1 ).
marginally significantp = 0.081.6× alphagold
This trend was marginally significant (ANOVA p = 0.08) in the 0–2 cm depth interval (Figure 1 ; n = 6 N-fertilized vs. n = 6 unfertilized samples, However, gene copy number normalized per gdw was not significantly different among treatments in the 0–2 cm depth interval (data not shown).
nearly significantp = 0.0801.6× alphagold
The interaction between bacterial incubation temperature and frog species was nearly significant (LMM: χ 2 = 5.061, p = 0.080) and showed the same pattern as in the full dataset: bacterial products from R. sphenocephala isolates inhibited Bd growth more strongly when they had been incubated at lower temperatures. 3.3.
moderately significantp = 0.0851.7× alphaqualifiedgold
We detect no significant difference between the bacterial evenness on day 3 (H = 0.592, p = 0.442), and only a moderately significant reduction in evenness of pollen with, compared to pollen without larvae, for time point day 9 and day 15 (H = 2.97 p = 0.085: and H = 2.81, p = 0.094), respectively.
marginally significantP = 0.0851.7× alphagold
Elevated CO 2 alone significantly ( P < 0.05) increased the signal intensities of mcrA for CH 4 production and pmoA for CH 4 oxidation, while the signal intensities of these two genes decreased under warming at marginally significant ( P = 0.085) or significant ( P = 0.033) levels, respectively ( Supplementary Figure S5 ).
an increasing trendp = 0.0871.7× alphagold
Additionally, there was an increasing trend in the number of helpful bacteria, particularly Prevotella_9 ( p = 0.087), Subdoligranulum ( p = 0.063), and unclassified_Bacteroidales ( p = 0.055), with their numbers 1.97-, 1.99-, and 4.65-fold higher than those of the CON piglets, respectively ( Figure 1D ).
an increasing trendp = 0.0881.8× alphagold
muciniphila led to an increasing trend in the Haugh unit ( p = 0.088) ( Figure 7A ), a significant increase in eggshell thickness ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 7B ), a lower egg yolk ratio, and reduced yolk cholesterol content ( p < 0.05) ( Figures 7C,D ); however, no changes in egg weight, eggshell strength, albumen height, or yolk color were observed ( Supplementary Table S6 ).