Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,685 sentences · 1 filter applied

The combination treatment also had the maximum percentage of tumor growth inhibition (TGI) at 82% compared to the control (0%), SAM (58%), and anti-PD-1 antibody (66%), although the TGI difference between the combination treatment and anti-PD-1 antibody alone was barely significant ( Figure 3 B).
More studies are warranted to draw stronger conclusions that may be significant for clinical practice. 6.
Pairwise Meta-Analysis for Chemotherapy Cohorts ( Supplementary Results 9 ) The use of PPIs is associated with a significant 12% higher all-cause mortality in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving chemotherapy, with a marginally significant higher progression rate ( Supplementary Figures S35 and S36 ).
highly significantqualifiedgold
In line with StringDB findings, the results confirm a highly significant role for immune-related functions ( Figure 1 c)—with “lymphocyte activation” (GO:0046649), “adaptive immune response” (GO:0002250), and “B cell activation” (GO:0042113) being top predicted pathways ( p < 10 −20 ).
In univariate analyses of overall survival according to the treatment factors, 90 min HIPEC (HR 0.541, 95%-CI 0.300–0.978; p = 0.042) and treatment with cisplatin only (as opposed to cisplatin and doxorubicin, which yielded an HR of 2.269 95%-CI 1.230–4.186; p = 0.009) appeared to be significantly superior in terms of overall survival, whereas only a small trend was observed for CCR with a benefit of CC0 resected patients ( Figure 4 , Table 4 ).
Predictors of Ibrutinib Treatment for ≥5 Years In multivariate analysis, several baseline characteristics showed a trend toward continuation of ibrutinib treatment for ≥5 years (age ≤ 73 years, female sex, creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min, TP53 mutated, del(11q), CLL histology, absence of bulky disease [<5 cm], β-2 microglobulin >3.5 mg/L, Rai stage III/IV, absence of cytopenia, and lactate dehydrogenase ≤250 U/L), but none reached statistical significance ( Figure 1 ). 3.3.
highly significantqualifiedgold
ALU 247 levels and lymph node status emerged as highly significant independent variables after univariate analysis, while the DI, age, tumor size, and tumor grade were of no significance—ALU 247: HR 1.302 (95% CI 1.074–1.578, p = 0.007); lymph node status: HR 9.441 (95% CI 2.026 to 44.003, p = 0.004) DI: HR 0.856 (95% CI 0.659–1.110, p = 0.24).