Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,685 sentences · 1 filter applied

a strong trendp = 0.0701.4× alphagold
Expression of miRNA-221 was not correlated with OS in the present patient cohort, however, in patients without neoadjuvant treatment miRNA-221 positive tumors showed a strong trend towards shortened OS ( p = 0.070) with a median OS of 64.0 months in miRNA-221 negative patients (95%CI not calculable) compared to a median OS of 22.1 month (95%CI 13.3–30.8 months).
nearly significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
On the contrary, among 157 patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy (a heterogeneous group of node-positive and/or pT4 and/or radically resected liver metastases patients; i.e., high-risk stage II patients and stage ≥ III cancers), MSS patients showed significantly better DFS rates (HR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.14–0.89; p = 0.005) and nearly significant OS rates (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.20–1.29; p = 0.07) than MSI patients, thus demonstrating that MSI tumors in advanced stages, requiring adjuvant therapy, are significantly disadvantaged or even harmed with conventional chemotherapy schedules ( Figure 2 and Figure 3 ). 3.2.
borderline significancep = 0.071.4× alpha
Although alterations in PI3K, TGF-Beta, and RTK/RAS pathways were not statistically significant, borderline significance was observed in genes related to these pathways, including EGFR ( p = 0.07), FGFR1 ( p = 0.05), FGFR2 ( p = 0.05), and PTPN11 ( p = 0.05) in the PI3K pathway and SMAD4 ( p = 0.08) in the TGF-Beta pathway.
a marked trendp = 0.071.4× alphagold
However, it is striking that nuclear/cytoplasmic expression of β-catenin has not been shown by itself in this meta-analysis to be significantly associated with poor survival, although a marked trend of effect is shown ( p = 0.07); this result is probably due to the paucity of primary studies addressing this question (3 studies, 255 patients).
marginally significantp = 0.071.4× alphagold
In addition, the MoRAL score showed the best calibration function with a non-significant p value ( p = 0.15) by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test; the WCM model and the AFP model, the second and third best models evaluated by c -index, were found to be less accurate with marginally significant p values ( p = 0.07, and p = 0.06, respectively).