Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,473 sentences · 1 filter applied

extremely significantp > 0.051.0× alphaqualified
When 0.01 < p < 0.05 is considered to have a significant difference, p < 0.01 is considered to have an extremely significant difference, and p > 0.05 is considered to have no significant difference.
an increasing trendp > 0.051.0× alphagold
For the Chao1 index, GAA and 5,6-DMB + Co treatments showed significant increases ( Figure 1 C, p < 0.05), whereas AGF exhibited an increasing trend without reaching statistical significance ( Figure 1 B, p > 0.05).
a trend towards significancep ≤ 0.051.0× alpha
This is the claim that p -values between 0.05 and 0.1 indicate a trend towards significance, most commonly expressed in the rote statement “The threshold for significance was set at p ≤ 0.05, and trends were reported at p < 0.10”.
an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Fecal Microbial Species Diversity Analysis of Weaned Piglets In α diversity, the observed species in the feces of piglets in the CON group significantly increased compared to the 0.2% group ( p < 0.05, Table 2 ); and the chao1 index in the CON group showed an increasing trend compared with the 0.2% group ( p < 0.05, Table 2 ), while other diversity index showed no significant difference ( p > 0.05, Table 2 ). β diversity results showed that the microbial community composition of the 0.2% group was significantly different from that of the CON group and the 0.125% group ( p < 0.05, Figure 1 C,F). 3.3.
an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Growth Performance As shown in Table 2 , the final weight of calves showed an increasing trend with the increase in the concentration of Zn amino acid complex supplementation; the final weight of calves in group C was higher than in group A ( p < 0.05); moreover, the average daily weight gain was 36.58% higher in group C compared to group A ( p < 0.05). 3.2.
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Although the FHV-I-FPV pair had the highest odds ratio (OR = 2.93) and the corresponding Fisher’s exact test yielded a nominally significant p value ( p < 0.05), after Bonferroni multiple testing correction (correction factor k = 6), none of the pairwise pathogen co-infection associations remained statistically significant (adjusted p > 0.05).
a decreasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Morphological Indices and Whole-Body Composition As shown in Table 4 , the HSI and VSI of the rice field eel exhibited a decreasing trend with increasing dietary threonine levels; the T4 group was significantly lower than the control group ( p < 0.05).