a strong trendp = 0.06
Intriguingly, MCD tumors within Cluster 2 showed significantly poorer OS and a strong trend toward worse PFS ( p = 0.06) compared to MCD tumors in Cluster 1, while EZB cases did not show such differences.
Intriguingly, MCD tumors within Cluster 2 showed significantly poorer OS and a strong trend toward worse PFS ( p = 0.06) compared to MCD tumors in Cluster 1, while EZB cases did not show such differences.
6 A), whereas PFS showed a clear trend toward worse outcomes in the unclassified group (Fig. 6 B).
Although the unclassified subtype lacks a defined biological identity in current classification systems, our findings suggest that, within this single-center cohort, Unclassified subtype clustered exclusively within the high-risk group and showed a trend toward inferior PFS.
Importantly, patients in Cluster 2 also had more adverse clinical features, including higher Ann Arbor stage and IPI, with elevated LDH levels trending toward significance.
In both analyses, the unclassified subtype did not reach statistical significance for either OS or PFS.