Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendP = 0.275.4× alpha
However, the EGDT‐GEDI group showed a trend of shorter ventilator support duration (5.1 days [2.0–8.7 days] versus 3.9 days [2.4–5.7 days], P = 0.27) and length of stay in the intensive care unit (7.2 days [3.8–10.7 days] versus 5.1 days [3.7–8.8 days], P = 0.05) and a smaller 3‐day infusion balance than the EGDT‐CVP group (4,405 mL [1,092–8,163 mL] versus 3,046 mL [830–6,806 mL], P = 0.34), but the differences were not statistically significant.
showed a trendp = 0.275.4× alpha
The mothers’ Verbal IQ, Non-Verbal IQ and IQ Composite, while not significantly different between the C- and E-groups, showed a trend in the direction of higher IQ scores in the C-group as compared to the E-group {Verbal IQ: C:109.84 (20.49); E:102.33 (11.11); p = 0.27, Non-Verbal IQ: C: 111.24 (14.88); E: 104.67 (12.06); p = 0.26; IQ Composite: C: 111.16 (16.75); E: (103.44 (11.45); p = 0.20}.
showed a trendP = .2725.4× alpha
Indeed, Cox models that estimated the hazard of “death before kidney failure” showed a trend, yet non-significant, towards higher survival in female patients [multivariable, HR 0.242, 95% CI (0.019, 3.033), P = .272] and lower survival in patients with higher baseline proteinuria [multivariable, per 1 g/g, HR 1.724, 95% CI (0.981, 3.029), P = .058] ( Supplementary data, Table S7 ).
showed a trendp = 0.2775.5× alpha
The comparison of the frequencies of the H1j/H2 diplotype between sporadic idiopathic PD (3/80) and control subjects (1/92) showed a trend of association since the odds ratio was 3.35 which remains still not significant (3.75 vs. 1.0%; OR, 3.55; 95% CI, 0.36–34.78; p = 0.277) due to the rarity of the diplotype and the small size of the samples.
showed a trendP =.285.6× alpha
Across all cycles, the foot reflexology group showed a trend toward less frequent delayed nausea ( P =.28), a significantly less frequent consumption of antiemetic drugs ( P =.04), and no significant difference for vomiting ( P =.99); there was a trend toward a perception of stronger severity for delayed nausea in the control group ( P =.39).