Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.010.2× alpha
However, at 1 month post-injury, a shift occurred where individuals with TBI significantly favored VIS+ and showed a trend of favoring VIS- (t = −2.65, uncorrected p = 0.01, corrected p = 0.03 and t = −2.02, uncorrected p = 0.05, corrected p = 0.07) while disfavoring DMN+ and showing a trend of disfavoring DMN- (t = 2.60, uncorrected p = 0.01, corrected p = 0.03 and t = 2.04, uncorrected p = 0.04, corrected p = 0.07) compared to controls ( Fig. 2 A).
showed a trendP = 0.010.2× alpha
When the data were averaged across animals on days 7–9 post-exposure, those exposed at 110 showed a trend suggestive of startle enhancements at high startle stimulus levels (≥105 dB SPL) (F 3,72 = 6.21, P = 0.01), but the enhancement was significant only at a startle stimulus level of 110 dB SPL (T 9 = 1.83, P = 0.05) ( Fig. 4B ).
showed a trendP < 0.010.2× alpha
Western blot analysis—In neonatal, ENDO showed a trend of expression, characterized by a significant increase from the inner to outer part of the meniscus (Fig. 3 , P < 0.01), while young and adult animals revealed no quantitative differences among the different meniscal areas (Fig. 3 , P > 0.05); furthermore, pooling the three zones, the young meniscus revealed a significantly higher expression of ENDO in comparison with neonatal and adult ones ( P < 0.01).
showed a trendp = 0.01090.2× alpha
Consistent with the results from the blood-based biomarkers, patients with increasing LV exhibited lower GM volume both at baseline (mean GMF: 0.43 ± 0.04 vs 0.44 ± 0.03; p = 0.0209), which showed a trend after FDR correction ( q = 0.0627), and at follow-up (mean GMF: 0.42 ± 0.04 vs 0.44 ± 0.03; p = 0.0109), which remained significant after correction ( q = 0.0490; Table 2 ).
showed a trendp = 0.0110.2× alpha
Younger participants showed a trend-level preference for pictures in the ‘Space’ ( F (1,183) = 6.7, p = 0.011) category. ‘Liking’ ratings for ‘HAI’ and ‘HTD’ categories A repeated measures ANCOVA yielded a significant main effect of category ( F (1,183) = 7.4, p = 0.007) and interactions between category and age ( F (1,183) = 12.5, p = 0.001), category and diagnosis ( F (1,183) = 15.2, p < 0.001), and category and gender ( F (1,183) = 19.4, p < 0.001; Figs 2B , 3B and 4B ).