In septic shock patients, only the comparison between high- and low-intensity NUF remained nominally significant (aHR 1.88, 95% CI 1.12–3.17, p = 0.018), which also did not meet the corrected significance threshold.
← all phrases
“nominally significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
For volume LQ, there was a nominally significant effect ( t (294) = 2.38, p = 0.018), indicating that left-handers (1.21, SD = 3.58) had a more positive LQ than right-handers (−0.49, SD = 3.48).
The two variants were not genome-wide significant in our study, but nominally significant into the same direction (p = 0.018 and p = 0.003).
Alcohol use disorder showed a nominally significant association with repeat offending (p = 0.018).
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0189
Although it did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons, rs6473797 showed nominally significant association ( P = 0.0189) with ADS.
Note that rs2071861 was only nominally significant ( P = 0.019, Table 3 ) in the discovery phase.
Results A nominally significant association was detected between CRC and the SNP rs12794714 in the vitamin D 25-hydroxylase gene CYP2R1 ( p = 0.019), a SNP that has previously been associated with serum vitamin D levels.
With respect to the phospholipids, the effect of group was nominally significant for PtdSer C20:3n‐6 relative percentage ( p = 0.019) and the TL C20:3n‐6 relative percentage ( p = 0.0087), but did not retain significance upon correction for multiple comparisons (Figure S4 ).
There were five variants in addition to rs1856746 in FCAMR , one of which, rs11119925, had a nominally significant interaction P in the AA and EA GWIS (AA P = 0.019, EA P = 0.034, Table A(a) in S1 File .
As measured by the Y-BOCS, the severity of OCS in the HR group was below the clinical range. Cognitive domains analysis The cognitive domain analysis revealed that the HR group exhibited a nominally significant overall underperformance in tasks measuring the motor and processing speed abilities ( p = 0.019; F = 3.115) (Fig. 1 a).
5h ) contained a nominally significant GWAS 30 variant rs886125 (GWAS P = 0.019, β = −0.149, effect/alternative allele = G) and was coaccessible (coaccessibility = 0.367) with MYL2 , a widely recognized HCM gene 80 .
Similarly, analyses of the low frequency variants in larger samples may be needed to refine estimates, including for rs187941554, for which our nominally significant association (HR 5.44, 95% CIs 1.33 to 22.30, p=0.019) was based on only two strokes in 32 subjects.
A nominally significant negative association was observed between engagement and change in food addiction symptoms (YFAS; rs = −0.64, p = .019), suggesting that higher engagement may be associated with greater reductions in food addiction symptomatology.
At the P -value threshold ⩽0.01, there was a ~33% reduction in the effect size but a nominally significant association remained ( β =0.02, P =0.019, r 2 =0.0004).
From the five estimated haplotypes, only one showed a nominally significant association ( P = 0.019; Table 2 ).
A nominally significant association with breast cancer was observed with the NBS1 tSNP rs709816 for carriage of the rare allele (OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.10–2.35, p = 0.019).
The correlations for D score and RMET were nominally significant but did not survive Bonferroni correction: D score, r s (99) = 0.233, p = 0.019, RMET, r s (53) = 0.329, p = 0.014.
Arterial density demonstrated a nominally significant negative association (odds ratio =0.320, P=0.019), though its q value (0.057) approached but did not meet the significance threshold; venous density followed a comparable trend (odds ratio =0.464, P=0.031, q value =0.080).
Genetically predicted AN showed nominally significant association with higher risk of acute gastritis (OR = 1.593, 95% CI: 1.081–2.347; P = .019) and Crohn disease (OR = 1.001, 95% CI: 1.00008–1.003; P = .038).
Parent-of-origin Analysis in Dutch IBD Trios A nominally significant genomic imprinting effect was found in the IL12B gene (α term: P = 0.019; OR = 3.2), with OR >1 indicating that the risk allele is more often transmitted from the mother to the child.
The initial IVW analysis revealed a nominally significant negative association between HDL-C and AD (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.29–0.89, p = 0.019), suggesting a potential protective effect of HDL-C.
Intriguingly, the Sherpa, who are closely related to other Tibetan populations and also have unelevated Hb levels [ 41 , 67 , 71 ], show a nominally significant trend towards lower frequencies of the Hb-increasing alleles in one of the two polygenic adaptation tests ( p = 0.019 without multiple test correction).
Nominally significant differences were detected between olanzapine-treated patients carrying COMT rs4680 AA, GA and GG genotypes in the total PANSS 0–6 scores (p = 0.019; Kruskal Wallis ANOVA and Dunn’s test), and in the PANSS 0–6 positive subscale scores (p = 0.027).
Among these variables, BQD duration demonstrated a nominally significant positive correlation with gBOLD‐CSF coupling ( r = 0.431, uncorrected p = 0.0195; Figure 4 ), with a moderate effect size ( r 2 = 0.186).
Circulating HDL levels are reported to be associated with decreased AD risk, and we observed nominally significant and positive covariance with CSF Aβ42 (r g- =0.007, SE = 0.003, p = 1.96×10 −02 ) in our analysis, although this failed to pass the FDR-corrected significance threshold.