Barely Significant
← all phrases

“nominally significant”

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 10,034 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Post hoc contrasts revealed that REM theta energy shows a negative statistical trend with the response of the anterior–superior hypothalamus (t = −1.81; p = 0.07) and a positive nominally significant association with the response of the posterior hypothalamus (t = 1.90; p = 0.05; Figure 2 A,B).
nominally significantp<0.051.0× alphagold
In addition, six of the 10 most significantly associated genes are known EE genes, and the majority of the known EE genes (17 out of 25) originally implicated in trio sequencing are nominally significant (p<0.05), a proportion significantly higher than the expected (Fisher’s exact p = 2.33×10 −17 ).
nominally significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Sample 2 Significant differences in KLF11 DNA methylation were observed between MDD patients with and without anxious depression at CpG site 1 ( p = 0.041) and, on a nominally significant level, with regard to average methylation ( p = 0.052) and methylation at CpG sites 2–4 ( p = 0.053-0.081; see Table 3 ; Fig. 3 ), with patients with non-anxious depression showing decreased KLF11 methylation.
A panel of all the nominally significant P -value SNPs in the top candidate genes discovered by CFG ( n =135 genes, 713 SNPs) was used to generate a genetic risk prediction score (GRPS), which showed a trend towards significance ( P =0.053) in separating alcohol dependent individuals from controls in an independent German test cohort.
nominally significantp = .0541.1× alphagold
In analyses predicting diagnostic status, the silent functional class and the nonsense were significantly associated with diagnostic status (corrected sum scores p = .006 and p = .018, respectively), with nominally significant findings in the missense class (combined corrected p = .054).
nominally significantp = 5.42 × 10 −21.1× alphagold
No associations remained significant with biological age, but the association with NK cells was nominally significant ( p = 5.42 × 10 −2 ). 4 DISCUSSION We conducted a comprehensive analysis of biological aging in Hispanics by building two established blood‐based epigenetic clocks of aging and testing associations with antemortem AD biomarkers, as well as validating these findings in the ROS/MAP cohort with postmortem brain measures.
nominally significantP = 0.05471.1× alphagold
The associations of cheiroarthropathy with neuropathy remained significant in a multivariable model adjusting for the other significant risk factors, whereas the association with retinopathy remained nominally significant ( P = 0.0547).
Musculoskeletal complications in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care · 2014 · PMC4067398
nominally significantP = 0.0551.1× alphagold
Stratified analysis based on gender, also revealed statistically significant higher occurrence of three haplotypes ( A-A-C-C-T-C-T , A-G-T-A-C-T-C and G-A-C-C-T-C-T ) in the male probands ( P ≤ 0.005; OR > 3) and nominally significant higher occurrence of the A-G-C-C-T-C-T haplotype in the female probands ( P = 0.055; OR = 8.23) as compared to sex-matched controls (Table 3 ).
nominally significantp = 5.76×10 -21.2× alphagold
TNM stage was found to influence the abundance of Fusobacterium in S1 samples (β = 0.610, 95% CI: 0.066 to 1.154, p = 2.80×10 -2 ) ( Supplementary Table 2 ), while CEA levels had a nominally significant association with the abundance of Holdemanella in S1 samples (β = -3.977, 95% CI: -8.161 to 0.20], p = 5.76×10 -2 ) ( Supplementary Table 4 ).
nominally significantP = 0.0581.2× alphagold
Interestingly, that variant, which was only border-line nominally significant in the standard marginal model ( P = 0.058), was reported to be associated with HDL, LDL, TG, and TC ( P = 7.9 × 10 −20 , P = 1.1 × 10 −34 , P = 3.5 × 10 −28 , P = 2.5 × 10 −32 , respectively) in the Willer et al. 28 study that included 188,577 individuals (Supplementary Data 5 ).
nominally significantp =0.0581.2× alphagold
Compared with the patients with nonelevated hsCRP levels and no ICAS, those with both elevated hsCRP levels and ICAS had increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke after adjustment (adjusted HR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.28–5.34; p =0.008) ( Table 2 ) , and a nominally significant association with recurrent ischemic stroke was observed among patients with nonelevated hsCRP levels and with ICAS (adjusted HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 0.98–4.20; p =0.058) ( Table 2 ) .