“marginally statistically significant”

When comparing those with and without social support, the difference in positive well-being and attachment scores was marginally statistically significant but with a large effect size, t (59) = −1.99, p = .05, d = 0.51.

In multivariate analysis, only steroid use (OR 0.121; 95% CI 0.015–0.988; p = 0.049) was found to be associated with prevalent fracture whereas lumbar spine T-score was marginally statistically significant (OR 0.744; 95% CI 0.553–1.002; p = 0.051).

A similarly direct association of reporting that their parents thought they were thin with higher odds of trying to gain weight was marginally statistically significant (adjusted OR = 1.4, p = .051).

Females in the fished area also paired with males of larger sizes, as all but three of the 15 pairs had a male larger than the female, with the average size difference smaller (6.4%) and marginally statistically significant ( t test: t = 2.034, df = 28.35, p = .051).

The presence of baseline microbleeds was associated with a higher frequency of solitary ARIA-H, though was only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.051).

Having greater schedule control was associated with lower odds of having at least one ER/urgent care visits and was only marginally statistically significant ( P = .051).

In addition, there was a shorter but marginally statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) in KRAS mutant patients with adenocarcinoma compared with those with non-adenocarcinoma (P=0.051).

Haemostatic therapy reduced the rate of haematoma expansion at a marginally statistically significant level when compared with placebo (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.00; p=0.051).

The difference in mean depression score was marginally statistically significant, with the high utilizer group averaging 10.0 and the low utilizer group averaging 6.0 (p = 0.051).

However, in the multivariate analysis, only steroid use was found to be significantly associated with prevalent VFs (OR 0.121, 0.015–0.988), with lumbar BMD being marginally statistically significant ( P = .051).

Furthermore, there was no correlation between the emergence of AEs after the first or second dose and the immunogenicity of the vaccine ( p = 0.803 and p = 0.123, respectively), although there was a marginally statistically significant correlation of the emergence of systematic AEs (i.e. fever) after the second dose of the vaccine with the antibody titer ( p = 0.051).

The total dose of PO-SABR given in more than three fractions was marginally statistically significant, favoring the OS ( p = 0.051).

Mixed linear model showed only a marginally statistically significant influence of sex on TMT B-A ( r = 0.876; p = 0.051) and MMSE changes ( r = 0.766; p = 0.064) (females showed slower decline).

7.7 ± 7.5), a difference that was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.051).

Multiple regression analysis showed that AST‐120 tended to increase the static‐start gait speed, although change was marginally statistically significant after adjustments for age, sex, primary disease, and physical activity (95% confidence interval 0.000–0.128, P = 0.051 and 95% confidence interval −0.003 to 0.128, P = 0.061 for ITT and PP analysis, respectively) ( Table S1 ).

Among participants in the low-risk group ( n = 73), the only statistically significant effect was for DERS scores (marginally statistically significant), F (1, 69) = 3.95, p =.051, η p 2 = 0.054, and a time × DERS interaction, F (1, 895) = 4.71, p =.034, η p 2 = 0.064.

In the logistic regression, the combined malignancy prediction model showed marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.0518) malignancy prediction capacity, compared to tumor size alone ( p = 0.07).

We found this association between the FOXL2 p.C134W mutation status and FOXL2 positivity by IHC to be marginally statistically significant (mid- p -value = 0.052).

There was a marginally statistically significant difference in age between any-PH and no-PH groups (66.6 ± 13.4 vs. 59.5 ± 13.2 years, p = 0.052).

A similar result was obtained in TC252, CTGF and FOSL2 mRNA expression was significantly reduced upon transfection of miRNA mimic hsa-miR-18a-5p compared to the negative control, while SERPINE1 was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0,052).

However, a marginally statistically significant difference in sensitivity was observed between GCUS and UGIS ( P = 0.052) (Table 4 ).

Although CWP was associated with cortisone levels on metabolomic screen ( P = 0.00069), the association was only marginally statistically significant when adjustment was made for FMI ( P = 0.052, data not shown).

The marginally statistically significant interaction between Device and Time (p = 0.052) suggests the difference in log(Flux) between Tropis and Needle/Syringe was not entirely consistent between 24 and 48 h.

Finally, MCT1 was overexpressed in 6/10 NSCLC samples (60%); however, the difference between the tumor tissues (median = 7.07) and the adjacent tissues (median = 9.51) was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.052) ( Figure 2 ). 3.3.

In the PSM-adjusted cohort, a trend toward longer DFS was observed in DG arm compared to the OXA arm, though the difference was only marginally statistically significant (mDFS 133.2 vs. 61.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.56; 95% CI 0.99–2.46; p = 0.052) as shown in Fig. 2a .