“marginally statistically significant”

However, one-way ANOVA revealed a marginally statistically significant difference ( p = 0.052) in Σ 4 NBFR concentrations in US food items from the three price groups.

A similar result was obtained in TC252, CTGF and FOSL2 mRNA expression was significantly reduced upon transfection of miRNA mimic hsa-miR-18a-5p compared to the negative control, while SERPINE1 was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0,052).

Although marginally statistically significant, there was a trend for a higher parasite load in clinically-lesioned skin from dogs from group B compared with group A (Mann-Whitney U -test: Z = -1,943, P = 0.052; Fig. 5 ; Table 2 ). qPCR The normal-looking skin of 18/25 (72%) dogs studied was qPCR positive for Leishmania (Table 1 ).

However, although the orally treated group weight mean was consistently lower than that of the subcutaneous at every time point but at −127 dpi, the overall weight difference between both groups was only marginally statistically significant at 77 and 92 dpi ( p = 0.0527 and p = 0.0712, respectively) when the effects/lesion areas of infestation were more severe.

The difference between these three health cadres was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.053).

43%), but these differences were only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.053).

Compared to the LP breakfast, energy intake was lower following the 39 g protein condition ( p < 0.001), and was lower with the 30 g protein breakfast, but this result was only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.053).

The correlation was marginally statistically significant, p = 0.053 (39 patients) and p = 0.057 (37 patients), suggesting that this negative relationship was unlikely to have occurred by chance (Figure 2 ), but requiring a more in‐depth study, covering more patients.

We found marginally statistically significant correlations ( r = 0.428; p = 0.053) between perceived feeling of human movement at the M cards in E-Prime PC administration (i.e., subjective ratings) and the M responses at the M Rorschach cards, in R-PAS standard administration.

There was a marginally statistically significant difference between the groups, which showed better OS in patients who are in CR/PR (P = 0.053).

Marginally statistically significant difference was observed in the range between TE graduates (d=40) and those of the DE grade (d=37), p=0.053.

This difference between groups was marginally statistically significant; mothers in the LNS group were approximately 6% more likely (p = 0.053) than mothers in the non-LNS group to report introducing complementary foods at six months of age.

The variable alcohol consumption (Q17d) did not show statistically significant differences between the study program groups of female student subsamples [H 1 = 0.018, P = 0.894], but a marginally statistically significant difference was observed in the male student subsample [H 1 = 3.741, P = 0.053], which speaks of reducing the amount of alcohol consumption by students, which can be explained by the decline in socializing of young people, often accompanied by alcohol consumption.

Paired t-tests for the change in DBP between the end of the first week (Day 7, 8) at 400 mg twice daily and the DBP at the end of the week of escalated dose (Day 21, 22) demonstrated marginally statistically significant increase for Arm A 3.0 mmHg (p = 0.053, 95% CI −0.04, 6.14) and no statistically significant increase for Arm B, 1.5 mmHg (p = 0.25, 95% CI −1.11, 4.06).

Moreover, the N stage exhibited a marginally statistically significant difference (P = 0.053), approaching the conventional significance threshold of α = 0.05.

Engagement was reported to be marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.053).

The difference in the number of records reporting the conduct of SEMLS was different between 2012–2017 and 2018–2022; however, this difference was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.053).

However, the interaction between condition and caregiver education was marginally statistically significant ( β = −0.57, p = 0.053, one-tailed).

The differences between the mean active-smoker proportion for these four gaming areas were marginally statistically significant (F = 2.804 (3), p = 0.053).

Introducing these measures reduces the size of the gender coefficient by roughly 50 percent and this coefficient is now marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.053 ).

For free browsing, the main effect of the reading-goals variable was marginally statistically significant [ F (1, 44) = 3.94, MSE = 79.37, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.08].

The mean HMGB1 levels were higher in vitreous samples with detectable levels of sRAGE compared with those without detectable levels of sRAGE; the difference was marginally statistically significant (p=0.0532; Table 3 ).

An independent samples t -test indicated that this small difference was marginally statistically significant, t (36) = 1.65, p = 0.054, r = 0.26.

Between-group comparison showed that PCSK7 levels were higher in the PCOS group compared to the control group, and this difference was marginally statistically significant (p = 0.054) ( Table 1 ).

In rat model testing, diabetic rats had marginally statistically significant elevated levels of global DNA hydroxymethylation compared to control rats ( p = 0.054).