“marginally statistically significant”

However, this difference was marginally statistically significant only for ETR rates (cirrhotics: 87% versus noncirrhotics: 97%, P = 0.05). 3.2.

This difference was marginally statistically significant in an independent sample t -test (t(4) = 2.7, p = 0.05).

4 a) showed an overall decrease for the historical period and both scenarios, being marginally statistically significant (p < 0.05) in the RCP8.5 scenario.

In the generalized linear model for MIH, the interaction term between race and postoperative uterine weight was marginally statistically significant ( p =0.05).

The increased protein content of the larvae fed the MO diets led to a reduced amount of carbohydrates and more specifically, there was a decrease of 3.44 (no statistically significant at p > 0.05), 5.23 (marginally statistically significant at p ≅ 0.05), and 31.77% (statistically significant at p < 0.05) in samples MO10, MO25, and MO50 compared to sample MO0, respectively.

Even if mean PPD did not reach a statistically significant value, the results showed that mean CAL was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.05).

In vignette C, which incorporated a diagnosis of dementia, we observed statistically significant differences ( p < .01) for all procedures except for communication, which had a marginally statistically significant difference ( p = .050).

Although the overall R change at this step was only marginally statistically significant, SOPT (beta = −0.29, p < 0.05) was found to be a significant predictor of the amplitude of the parietal positivity for the right electrode region.

Of the six possible pairwise correlations, we found only one that was marginally statistically significant at p < 0.05—a finding that could easily be the result of chance fluctuations and multiple comparisons.

GL and Weight Change When we categorized vegetables as either lower or higher GL ( S4 and S5 Tables), lower-GL vegetables were inversely associated with weight change ( Fig 7 ), a difference that was marginally statistically significant (pooled p = 0.05).

The difference between subgroups was marginally statistically significant (Chi2=3.84, df=1, P = 0.05, I2=73.9%).

The regression coefficients β 0 = 0.0701 (SE = 0.0152), β 2 = 0.0370 (SE = 0.0065), β 3 = 0.0194 (SE = 0.0056) and β 6 = 0.0008 (SE = 0.0003) were marginally statistically significant at P = 0.05 and R 2 = 0.726.

Conversely, among low usual media multitaskers, the 25-trial omission moving average was associated with a marginally statistically significant linear decrease (β = −0.01; P < 0.05), with an adjusted R 2 value of 0.19.

After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, gender, occupation, patient contact, and having young children in the household, we observed an increase in the odds of reporting unplanned absenteeism for each score increment in overall burnout scores, but the association was only marginally statistically significant: (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.03, p = 0.05).

When making similar adjustments for her expressive vocabulary (raw score increased from 16 to 21), the difference was marginally statistically significant ( p = .05; point estimate increased from .59% to 2.48%).

The Hp 2-1 genotype had 2.64 (1.0–7.08) higher odds of CAD than the Hp 1-1 genotype; however, this was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.05).

In eight of the 11 questions, a statistically significant difference was recorded at p<0.001 (questions 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 11), and in the two marginally statistically significant differences, p = 0.05 (questions 4 and 10) were established.

The analysis indicated that the overall model was marginally statistically significant (F = 2.507, df1 = 2, df2 = 48, p = 0.050) and explained 9.5% of the variance in the number of maternal symptoms (R2 = 0.095).

In the univariate analysis of baseline factors predicting the development of POAG in the LALES, the OR for POAG per 40 μm decrease in CCT was 1.16 (95% CI: 0.90 to 1.50, p value=0.25), while in the multivariable analysis, adjusted for IOP, this association estimate became marginally statistically significant with an OR for POAG of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.00 to 1.70, p value=0.05).

A negative, marginally statistically significant association was observed between the LOS and the Joint Commission Accreditation Status of the hospital (b = −0.077, p = 0.05).

Results Opposite sex A marginally statistically significant interaction effect between the romantic prime and viewer's sex on attitude toward the male model ad was observed [ t = 1.65, p = 0.05 (one-tailed)].

Interestingly, the Vindija 33.19 Neandertal seems to have lived in a subpopulation of larger size than the two Siberian Neandertals, although this difference is only marginally statistically significant when the proportion of the genomes covered by all HBD tracts longer than 2.5 cM is considered (likelihood-ratio test, P = 0.05).

There was a marginally statistically significant difference in reported race among patients with SIS in the PRE versus POST periods ( p = 0.05).

For jet speed, the models show a marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.05) positive trend in multimodel mean jet speed (0.026 m s −1 decade −1 ), but this is about 20 times weaker than the observed trend from ERA5.

Chromosomal aberrations of GS-intestinal and GS-diffuse tumors were similar with only a few marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.05; FDR < 0.27) differences between these two subgroups: losses of chromosomes 4p16.3, 6q14.1–q15, and 10p12.31–p12.1 occurred more often in GS-intestinal than GS-diffuse tumors, whereas gains of chromosome 8 occurred more often in GS-diffuse than GS-intestinal tumors.