LVEF at the time of ICD implantation was lower in the PPCM group (median 18% vs 25%), but this was only marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.07).
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
Serum ALT levels [median (IQR)] were significantly lower in cases [16.0 (11.0–24.0), U/L] than controls [17.0 (11.0–25.0), U/L] ( P < .01), while serum ALP levels were higher in cases [79.0 (66.0–95.0), U/L] than in controls [76.0 (63.0–93.0), U/L] with the difference being marginally statistically significant ( P = .07) ( Table 1 ).
The difference in the change for children aged 11 to 13 years and 14 to 16 years (17 minutes) was only marginally statistically significant, F (1, 1866) = 3.21; p = .07.
Absolute increases of about 5% in being informed of transplant options were seen over study follow-up for all incident ESRD patients, although the trend was marginally statistically significant for LN-ESRD patients ( P = 0.07; Table 2 ).
There was a marginally statistically significant different distribution of race/ethnicity by group, X 2 (2) = 5.3, p = 0.07, with more African American participants in the PWOA group than in the PWA group.
The overall association between diagnosis at the time of admission to the ICU and respiratory virus positivity was marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.07; Table 3 ).
The only marginally statistically significant sign was palpable lymph nodes, which were only present in the lymphoproliferative group (p = 0.07).
The lag time of 20 years for Detroit was marginally statistically significant (p-value=0.07).
The difference was, however, marginally statistically significant ( p -value = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.96–2.83).
In comparison, the controls showed a small reduction that was marginally statistically significant, t (53.7) = −1.86, p = .07.
When looking across all celebrities, regardless of consensus level, there was also a negative association between mean loneliness scores and pairwise semantic similarity, but the effect was only marginally statistically significant in this case (i.e., it was attenuated by the addition of low-consensus celebrities; β = −0.03, SE = 0.02, t (914) = 1.45, p = 0.07, 95% CI = −0.07 to 0.01).
When partitioned by chromosomal location, X-linked loci also show significantly elevated diversity in African strains (17.30 × 10 -3 versus 8.15 × 10 -3 , P = 0.008, paired sign test), while the increase in African diversity at autosomal loci was only marginally statistically significant (17.79 × 10 -3 versus 9.39 × 10 -3 , P = 0.07, paired sign test).
A marginally statistically significant relationship was found between mean pursuit duration on the red triangle for random movies, F(19,3) = 2.79, p = 0.07.
Estimated D6D activity was unchanged ( P =0.79) while ELOVL5 activity was higher in MI ( P =0.04), and D5D activity was also higher in MI but only marginally statistically significant ( P =0.07).
The time spent in food stores as collected by the recall diary were negatively correlated with the frequency of food store visits though this was only marginally statistically significant (r = -0.12, p = 0.07).
This much restricted sample suggests that the survival of those men who never married during their lifetime (NN = 216) had 5% lower survival than married men, but this result was only marginally statistically significant (H±SE: 0.95 ± 0.03, p = 0.07).
7 RESULTS The main analysis revealed only a marginally statistically significant interaction of context and condition, χ 2 ( df = 1) = 3.35, p = .07 as well as of time‐distance and context, χ 2 ( df = 1) = 3.32, p = .07.
PTSD+ participants experienced more improvement in pain from baseline to posttreatment than PTSD− participants by a small to moderate, marginally statistically significant amount ( d = .39, p = .07).
The index was marginally statistically significant in Seattle (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.99; p = 0.071).
In terms of the dependent variable, BMI, there were marginally statistically significant mean differences between the two groups at Fall Kindergarten ( p = 0.071) where movers had greater BMIs than non-movers.
Also, the transverse temporal gyrus/primary auditory cortex (A1), part of the dorsal auditory stream was marginally statistically significant (MD, r = 0.132, p = 0.072).
Patients who started on ibrutinib had a higher risk to develop AF in comparison to acalabrutinib, although the difference was marginally statistically significant in a univariant model ( p ‐value = 0.073 as reported in Table 1 ).
Differences in adult care seeking location by region were marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.073); a higher proportion of households in the South (70.7 %) used public sector facilities as compared to in the North (52.9 %) and Central (47.8 %) regions.
In contrast, high farm density was associated with a 48% reduction in the number of compounds detected (RR = 0.52, p = 0.036), and the results were marginally statistically significant at medium versus low farm density (RR = 0.59, p = 0.075).
In Step 2, with the three Internet-specific justification belief variables included in the equation, the model was only marginally statistically significant, F (4, 66) = 2.234, p = 0.075.