Survival analysis showed that their association with prognosis was marginally statistically significant (log-rank test, P = .075; Cox regression, HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.28–1.14]; Supplementary Figure S6b–c).
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
In contrast, high farm density was associated with a 48% reduction in the number of compounds detected (RR = 0.52, p = 0.036), and the results were marginally statistically significant at medium versus low farm density (RR = 0.59, p = 0.075).
The z‐scores tested against 0 (i.e., equivalent means of AV and A + V) showed a marginally statistically significant MSI effect, t (38) = −1.46, p = .076, BF10 = 0.46.
Finally, there is also a marginally statistically significant increase of interest in recent years (notably in 2019/2020) in plant physiological trait research ( χ 2 = 3.2, df = 1, p = .076), which appears to be driven primarily by increased interest in the role of ecophysiological and functional traits in invasive plant success within invaded ecosystems. 4
The difference in the effect sizes between secondary school population and elementary school population is 0.36 SD s, which is marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.076).
The partial correlation between percent signal change in right IPS and LNS was marginally statistically significant for 22q11DS patients (r(11) = 0.420, p = 0.076), but not for controls (r(21) = 0.194, p = 0.187).
Finally, studies that used quantitative measurement instruments to assess ED symptomatology, such as EDE-Q or EAT, that had a larger mean effect size ( r + = .364) than the studies that used other instruments ( r + = .177), although this difference was only marginally statistically significant ( p = .077, R 2 = .01).
Parametric ANOVAs indicated differences in mean pH values that were marginally statistically significant (p = 0.077).
Screening colonoscopy volume declined more in the public hospital system compared to the private health system, with a marginally statistically significant difference in the extent of decline between two health care systems (p = 0.077).
Although the differences were small and only marginally statistically significant (Student’ t-test p = 0.077 to 0.131 between within 1 st and outside of 2 nd ring groups depending on which cutoff is used), there was consistency with differences in mean BMI between categories for students aged 16 to 17.
When we analyzed a simple relationship between HTLV‐1 positive rate and the population density of residential area at municipal level using a simple linear correlation, overall there were weak‐negative linear correlations between the two factors (Supporting Information Figure S1D‐F); in particularly in male (Supporting Information Figure S1E), the relationship was marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.077). 4.
Although only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.077), all youth who tested positive had been on the street for at least one year.
After different interventions, for disgusted expression, the napping group showed a marginally statistically significant improvement (MD=0.0394, 95% CI (0.0092, 0.0696), adjusted P =0.077), while the control group showed a non-significant improvement (MD=0.0241, 95% CI (−0.0039, 0.0521), adjusted P >0.05).
Regarding chest CT scan findings, patients with unilateral right lung involvement were at increased risk of death (OR=1.66, 95% CI: 0.94–2.91) as compared with unilateral left lung involvement, although this increase was marginally statistically significant (P=0.078).
Lastly, for AO, 61.6% of women with low asset ownership reported delayed parenthood, while 22.6% with high asset ownership did so, though this result was also marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.078).
With respect to gender, we found a marginally statistically significant interaction ( OR = 3.62; p = 0.079) between gender and employment at baseline in their prediction of incarceration; the protective effect of being employed at baseline was driven by the benefits for females, with little if any benefit for males.
The patients with the CC + CT genotype displayed a shorter overall survival, as indicated by the log-rank test; this result was marginally statistically significant ( P =0.079; Table 3 and Figure 2A ).
Across all groups, we found a positive but marginally statistically significant relationship between impact, measured by number of votes a node received, and degree centrality (rho = 0.151; p = 0.079).
Differences in percentages between the two study times were statistically insignificant for men, χ 2 (1, N = 794) = 0.53, p = 0.467, whereas they were marginally statistically significant for women, χ 2 (1, N = 794) = 3.08, p = 0.079.
A similar trend of greater healthcare cost reduction was observed among those who quit smoking and switched to ST in the SW cohort, but the difference was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.08), possibly due to the small number of patients in the ST cohort and reduction in statistical power after the introduction of covariates.
As such, we consider marginally statistically significant the association between internet use and social relationship ( P =.08) and cultural activities dimensions ( P =.09).
These differences were not significant for permanent teeth and were only marginally statistically significant for deciduous teeth ( p < 0.08).
Although, this association was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.08) in the female sample.
Frequency of hot flash/day in Black Cohosh (1.82±1.12) decreased compared to Fluoxetine group (1.11±1.48), which was marginally statistically significant (p=0.08). 60% and 65% of patients in Fluoxetine and black Cohosh groups were satisfied with their treatment, respectively.
Neither baseline body mass index nor PA was statistically significantly associated with PFS or OS, although there was a marginally statistically significant increase in PFS (hazard ratio = 0.83, 95% confidence interval = 0.79 to 1.02; P = .08) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.81, 95% confidence interval = 0.65 to 1.02; P = .07) in patients who reported PA greater than 9 MET hours per week vs 0-9 MET hours per week.