Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally statistically significant”

1,111 sentences · 1,111 papers · 1,322 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

19 A pilot study comparing capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in patients suspected of small bowel bleeding demonstrated a marginally statistically significant high diagnostic yield of 55% compared to 30% (p=0.065). 25 The third-generation SB3, with improved optics and adaptive frame rate of up to six frames per second, was developed to enhance diagnostic yield.
There was a marginally statistically significant effect of both trait rumination F (1, 58) = 3.54, p = .065, η p 2 = . 06 and state rumination F (1, 58) = 3.22, p = .078. η p 2 = . 05 on TRI scores, but no effect of either trait rumination F (1, 58) = 4, p = .409, η p 2 = . 01 or state rumination F (1, 58) =, p = .102, η p 2 = . 05 on TUT scores.
marginally statistically significantp = 0.0661.3× alphagold
Rhesus macaques exposed to morphine also had a marginally statistically significant increased expression of the myeloid activation marker Iba-1 ( p = 0.066) that was also shown to increasingly colocalize with SIVp27 ( Supplementary Figures 4C,E ).
Across the 9 provider organizations that enabled auto-query, the ratio of automatic to manual links ranged from 2:1 to 31:1. Impact of patient consent Provider organizations that required consent experienced a marginally statistically significant increase in clinical summary exchange volume of 510 summaries per month (P = .066, Table 3 ).
In addition, marginally statistically significant differences were observed for somatization ( p =0.067), obsessive-compulsive symptoms ( p =0.074), anxiety ( p =0.064), hostility ( p =0.050), and paranoid ideation ( p =0.066), indicating a trend toward increased psychological distress and emotional tension among patients with genital involvement.
marginally statistically significantp = 0.0671.3× alphagold
Predicting disability progression from lesion volume The slope for predicting log-relative-risk of EDSS progression from the log-ratio of median follow-up in T2 volume (expressed as a percentage of baseline volume) was statistically significant for the RRMS subset of studies (1.95, 95% CI [0.43, 3.48], p = 0.015) and marginally statistically significant for the subset of RRMS studies on approved DMTs (1.09, 95% CI [-0.09, 2.27], p = 0.067).
marginally statistically significantp < 0.0671.3× alphagold
33 Stratified controlled models were marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.067), indicating that among those who reported difficulty obtaining their method, injectable users were 6.0 times (95%CI: 0.88, 41.44) times as likely to have discontinued contraception compared to non-injectable users (not shown in Table).