General TEQ scores remained quite stable, with a marginally statistically significant increase ( p = 0.06).
← all phrases
“marginally statistically significant”
Sighted at
p=0.08
In the literature
As necrosis score, only a marginally statistically significant was found among microsatellite instability (MSS) individuals in DFS ( P = 0.06; Supplementary Fig.
Study-specific and combined estimates for birth asphyxia and deaths due to preterm complications (when available) were lower than 1.0; in the case of prematurity, the result was marginally statistically significant (p=0.06, RR=0.56 [95% CI: 0.30 – 1.02]).
Although it was only marginally statistically significant, we observed an obvious trend ( P = 0.06) for poorer response rates among patients with >20% CD44+ EOC stem cells.
For SBV, the detected prevalence was higher in healthy honeybees (35.19%) than in affected honeybees (22.47%), but the difference was only marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.0601).
A comparison of the proportion between those who visited the clinic and those who did not showed marginally statistically significant differences ( p = 0.0606). 4.
longisporum DNA in the local and systemic treatments, but differences were only marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.061 and p = 0.092, respectively).
In this model, steroid therapy remained the sole independent predictor of VF progression, although it was marginally statistically significant (OR: 8.260 (95 % CI: 0.909–75.095), p = 0.061). 4 Discussion In this study, which enrolled metastatic patients with lung cancer and melanoma, it was found that 7.4 % (10/135) experienced VFs that are notoriously expression of skeletal fragility [9] .
Testing the Interaction Term and the Main Effect of Global and Regional Aβ Burden and WMHs with Cognition The moderation regression analysis detected a marginally statistically significant interaction effect between Aβ burden and WMHs in relation to baseline EF ( p -value = 0.061), and a significant interaction term between the biomarkers in relation to longitudinal executive functions with p -value = 0.036.
Fig 6B compares the number of DMRs in two groups of genes: there are more tumor-benign DMRs in the genes which lost genetic regulation in TCGA tumors, with a marginally statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.0612).
When categorizing objects, participants in the abstract condition drew .82 (95% CI [0.67, 1.01]) times the number of groups as those in the concrete condition, which was a marginally statistically significant result, Wald χ 2 = 3.47, p = .062.
The interaction between noise sensitivity and NFCC is equal to -0.286 and is marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.062).
There was an overall reduction over the surveillance period (18.4%) that was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.062).
However, when analyzing the conditional effect of Family’s Income on BMI at the values of KHE, data indicates that for higher scores on KHE the effect of Family’s Income on BMI is marginally statistically significant ( b = 0.0909, p = 0.0624).
The odds of receipt of the recommended 4 or more ANC visits (at time of study) also increased from baseline to endline although this change was only marginally statistically significant (aOR: 1.45, p = 0.063).
The Effect of Perceived Physical Safety on Desire for Female Wealth-Signalling Products For wealth-signalling products and the physical safety scenario, the estimation results indicated that for subjects who were given the safe (secure) scenario, their change in desirability was on average −0.28 and marginally statistically significant at the 7% level (t = −1.88, p = 0.063; equivalently, F (1,75) = 3.551, p = 0.063), while for those that were given the harsh scenario, their change in desirability was on average −1.07 and strongly statistically significant (F (1,75) = 47.987, p = 1.271 × 10 −9 ).
In bivariate analyses, delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic “peak” and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 were associated with lower birth satisfaction and higher perceived health care discrimination, although SARS-CoV-2 positivity and perceived discrimination was only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.063) (Table 1 ).
For lymphovascular invasion (LVI), 2% of cases were in the MSI‐High group and 98% in the MSI‐Negative group; this difference was marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.063).
Both groups showed a strong shift toward decreased levels of depression when compared to baseline, although the changes were marginally statistically significant in GBP480 ( p = 0.064, −56.67%, d = 0.731), as well as in GBP240 ( p = 0.059, −59.38%, d = 0.731).
Additionally, with respect to the changes in blood pressure following the 8-week trial, only a moderate reduction in the level of SBP was observed in those who consumed RBO compared with controls, although this difference was marginally statistically significant (baseline adjusted mean (SD): 125.74 (7.14) mmHg vs 129.89 (7.32) mmHg; effect size: -0.58 (-1.18 – -0.03); P value = 0.064, using ANCOVA test) (Table 2 ).
For sheath 1, a marginally statistically significant difference with the control was observed (mean difference 77, p = 0.064, −3–157).
Table 3 shows that females have more psychiatric disorders than males (51 and 41%, respectively) however, this difference was marginally statistically significant ( P = 0.064).
A similar pattern was found with CVD mortality, with the exception of difficulty falling asleep at the 7.5–14.9 PA level, which had a marginally statistically significant association (HR = 1.335, 95%CI: 0.983–1.812, p = 0.064) ( Fig. 2 B).
19 A pilot study comparing capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in patients suspected of small bowel bleeding demonstrated a marginally statistically significant high diagnostic yield of 55% compared to 30% (p=0.065). 25 The third-generation SB3, with improved optics and adaptive frame rate of up to six frames per second, was developed to enhance diagnostic yield.
Loneliness was also associated with greater likelihood of staying in a negative state (i.e., negative-to-negative), although this relationship was marginally statistically significant ( β = 0.061, SE = 0.033, p = 0.065, 95% CI [-0.004, 0.126], τ2 = 0.006, I 2 = 0.77%).