“marginally significant”

Marginally significant variation also remained in the HbSS patients ( P = 0.049 at I-02, Table 2 ).

In haplotype analyses, marginally significant association was found between AAA and haplotype HLA-DQA1-DRB1 (p = 0.049 with global score statistics and p = 0.002 with haplotype-specific score statistics).

In contrast, OM-S TTP was 1 week longer (4 (3–7) weeks) than SDP TTP (3 (1–5) weeks) in the 5-day arm; however, the difference was marginally significant (p=0.049) ( figure 2 ).

However, the association was marginally significant (p = 0.049).

Besides, the result of MR-Egger was not significant (p-value >0.05), while that of the weighted median method was marginally significant (OR = 1.002 [1.000, 1.004], p-value = 0.049) at the discovery stage.

The one exception was a marginally significant negative univariable association between becoming a refugee and persistence of externalizing disorders (RR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.3-1.0]; χ 2 1 = 3.9, P = .049).

We also observed a marginally significant ( p = 0.049) association between increased processing speed and protective odds for dyslexia (OR 0.95; 95% 0.89–1.00) compared to typical readers.

However, in terms of serum levels of autoantibodies, the only anti-PAIP2 autoantibody exhibited marginally significant difference ( p = 0.049) in autoantibody levels between ApoE4 and non-ApoE4 carriers (Supplementary Tables 6 and 7 ).

However, as shown by Table 5 below, when adjusting for SGA (by respective tool), the association between weight-based growth failure using IG-21st and adverse language development becomes marginally significant ( p = 0.049).

In most lifestyle cases, no significant differences were identified, except for the combination of residence type with household appliances ( p = 0.003) and the time spent eating, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.049) (Table 4 ).

However, stage IV remains to be a strong independent predictor ( p < 0.001), with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) being marginally significant ( p = 0.049).

Glucose The change in serum glucose concentration in the four exercises relative to sedentary trials was marginally significant (F (df 4,11) = 3.38, p = 0.049, Figure 7 ).

Notably, in our study, the WAnT C condition showed a marginally significant advantage over the WAnT P condition in terms of RPM max ( p = 0.049) and AvPO ( p = 0.042), while PPO, POmin, and tPPO values remained similar.

Linear mixed-effects models showed that the seasonal effect on yield did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.054), while the effect on stability was marginally significant ( p = 0.049).

Indeed, we observed a marginally significant correlation between irAE ROR and objective response rates 14 in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy ( Rs = 0.44; P = 0.049; Supplementary Fig. 1 ).

While the main effect of condition was not significant ( F (1,24) = 1.88, p = 0.18, η p 2 = 0.08), the condition by age interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,24) = 4.31, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.16), suggesting that older adults’ performance was lower when emotional distractors were presented compared with neutral distractors ( F (12) = 5.46, p = 0.039, η p 2 = 0.33 ).

Despite the perfect agreement between ITS1-PCR and ITS1-219-NGS (kappa statistic = 0.82), the 6% increase in sensitivity was marginally significant (McNemar’s test, P = 0.049) which justifies the use of the new assay.

These results were further confirmed by a linear mixed-effects ANOVA ( S1Table ), in which the epoch x inactivation interaction was marginally significant in the high-gamma band ( p = 0.049) with no other significant main or interaction effects (all other p > 0.05).

DHE loading of non-exposed meiocytes revealed ROS in ~20% of wild-type and pcl1 ∆ cells, and in ~30% of ctt1 ∆ cells, a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.049) ( Figure 3 A).

Similarly, a Tukey HSD test found that the greater proportion of fourth-instar and adult virginoparae (gall reproductives) in the distal section (0.111 ± 0.003) than in the medial section (0.064 ± 0.003) was marginally significant ( P = 0.049).

Similarly, the variation of task performance (computed as standard deviation across the 64 movement conditions) showed a trend of reduced variation after training (negative change values in Table 2 ), which was marginally significant only in the case of the end-error measures (F (1,14) = 4.66, p = 0.049, partial η 2 = 0.25).

Perceptual thresholds for detecting coherent motion (the minimum coherence level guaranteeing 80% accuracy) were higher (lower performance level) in patients than in controls [controls: 25.05 ( SD = 16.05), patients: 43.25( SD = 36.06)]; the group difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.049, Cohen's d = 0.65).

Heart failure, while not statistically related to LTI in the CR stratum when race was age‐centered (Model 8), was marginally significant in the probit CR stratum ( p = 0.049).

At the entire population and regional scales, lack of correlations between genetic ( F ST ) and geographic distances (both linear and altitudinal slope) was a common phenomenon according to the Mantel test, and only the SE-SW comparison showed a marginally significant correlation between genetic distance and linear geographic distance ( r = 0.314, P = 0.049 for Chs sequences and r = 0.295, P = 0.047 for Lfy sequences, 1000 permutations, one-tailed test).

after: 0.78 ± 2.03, p -value < 0.001) were observed after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, while a marginally significant decrease was observed in time to laboratory test (before: 0.58 ± 1.57 vs. after: 0.56 ± 1.43, p -value = 0.049).