“marginally significant”

We observed a marginally significant poorer survival rate in astrocytoma patients who expressed high levels of NR_002809 (p = 0.049, Fig 3A ), and low levels of BC002811 (p = 0.026, Fig 3B ) and XLOC_010967 (p = 0.024, Fig 3C ).

However, stage IV remains to be a strong independent predictor ( p < 0.001), with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) being marginally significant ( p = 0.049).

In addition, when T1 measures were compared between youth who did or did not participate in T2, t-tests showed only a marginally significant difference in developmental milestones achievement ( t (144) = −1.98, p = 0.049), with higher scores obtained by the former ( M = 13.8, SD = 16.6 vs.

The only other significant correlation was between the linguistic TD factor and dialogic inner speech; however, this was a positive correlation and marginally significant ( p = 0.049).

A type-I error could possibly explain this unexpected and marginally significant result ( p = 0.049), or these observations may – at first glance – suggest that C. tamandua males are willing to undermine reproductive isolation.

Regarding frequency, no significant interaction between week and group was detected ( P =.81), whereas a marginally significant difference was observed between groups at week 5 ( P =.049).

australis however, marginally significant differences were detected in trial 2 (χ 2 3 = 7.86, p = 0.049) where emergence was significantly lower by 27% in the Native Soil Pellets compared with the Bare Seeds ( p = 0.03).

Marginally significant difference in DFS between the 6-month therapy group and the surgery alone group was observed in the multivariable analysis (HR=3.02, 95%CI, 1.00 to 9.07; P=0.049).

The current smoking status of the father was associated with a lower risk of UCVA <6/18 compared with participants with a father who never smoked (OR (95% CI), 0.94 (0.90 to 0.99); p=0.010), and also a marginally significant association between current smoking status of the father and the prevalence of UCVA <6/12 was observed (OR (95% CI), 0.97 (0.93 to 1.00); p=0.049).

For tooth loss, the highest tertile of tooth loss had a HR of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.01, 2.92), and there was a marginally significant linear trend across the tertiles of tooth loss ( p = 0.049).

We found no significant effects, except “eigen-centrality” for male–male connections having a marginally significant positive effect on the number of partners (GLM type II F-test, P = 0.049), suggesting that male dominance status affects female choice.

There was a significant interaction ROI x hemisphere for hand and foot patterns (left foot pattern: F [2,198] = 16.55, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.143; right foot pattern: F [2,198] = 11.98, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.108; left hand pattern: F [2,198] = 3.80, p = 0.024, η p 2 = 0.037; and right hand pattern: F [2,198] = 34.88, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.261), while a marginally significant effect was found for the tongue pattern ( F [2,198] = 3.05, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.030).

Glucose The change in serum glucose concentration in the four exercises relative to sedentary trials was marginally significant (F (df 4,11) = 3.38, p = 0.049, Figure 7 ).

This generalized linear mixed model revealed a significant main effect of fairness ( F (1, 3217) = 4.77, p = 0.029) and a marginally significant group by fairness interaction effect ( F (1, 3217) = 3.87, p = 0.049).

Pairwise comparison of the obtained 41 archaeal-bacterial pairs found marginally significant differences in CRISPR array and cas gene cluster abundances, but not in the abundances of spacers and cas genes (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, p = 0.049, 0.047, 0.572, and 0.313, respectively).

However, there was a marginally significant negative correlation between the CSHQ score and the cognitive scores of the children ( r(195) = -0.14, p = 0.049), indicating that parent reported sleep disturbances explained almost 2% of the variance in cognitive scores across children.

ANOVA results showed that the effect of different vermicompost concentrations on the target response value was marginally significant (F=3.45, P=0.049≈0.05), only reaching the significance level of α=0.05. 4.4.

There was, however, a marginally significant difference in the LHB slopes between groups, t (53) = 2.01, p = 0.049, 95% CI [0.0000003, 0.0002], d = 0.55, two‐tailed independent t ‐test, BF 10 = 1.43; the BF, however, suggests that evidence for this effect is weak or inconclusive. 3.5 Exploratory Correlations Between Behavioural and Neurophysiological Measures Exploratory partial correlations, controlling for Age Group, were performed to investigate the associations between behavioural performance indices and neurophysiological signals.

By contrast, the effect of geographic location (island) was marginally significant ( R 2 = 1.91, p = 0.049), with the interaction between antibiotic status and island again identified as significant ( R 2 = 2.8305, p = 0.013).

The difference was found to be marginally significant by the exact test (exact two-sided significance, P =0.049).

Marginally significant variation also remained in the HbSS patients ( P = 0.049 at I-02, Table 2 ).

There was a marginally significant group by ADHD symptom interaction ( F (1,68) = 4.001, p = 0.049).

Femininity was a marginally significant predictor of thin ideal internalization, with a small effect size (β = 0.1302, z = 1.97, p = 0.049), although the corresponding confidence interval included zero (95% CI [−0.0219, 0.4400]). 4 Discussion This study extends existing research by examining sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals in Romania, an Eastern European context largely underrepresented in the literature on eating disorders.

A marginally significant interaction effect was found for the interaction of Time × Agent [ F (1,22) = 4.35, p = 0.049], but no significant main effect of Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.49, p = 0.491] and no significant interaction effects of Advice × Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.10, p = 0.758], Advice × Time [ F (1,22) = 0.07, p = 0.798], and Advice × Time × Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.06, p = 0.811] were found.

Moreover, although 5 s of S1 TPS induced a modest heterosynaptic facilitation of EPSP‐evoked CS bursting at S2 synapses in control experiments ( P CSB = 0.29) (Figure 8D ), EPSP‐evoked CS bursting during S2 TPS was enhanced when S1 and S2 TPS trains were delivered in the presence of ISO ( P CSB = 0.65), although this effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.049) (Figure 8E ).