The total effect of TNF-alpha on depressive symptoms was significant (c = 6.32, SE = 1.84, t = 3.44, p = 0.001), when controlling for PHQ-15, the direct effect remained marginally significant (c' = 2.99, SE = 1.50, t = 1.99, p = 0.049), suggesting a partial mediation of PHQ-15 ( figure 2 ).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
Regarding repeated measures analysis of RTs, a main effect of age was marginally significant, F (1, 102) = 3.98, p = 0.049, ƞ 2 = 0.04, in which the RTs of the children were longer than those of the adults.
The comparison of the normalized PA intensities among cholesterol polyps, adenomas, and adenocarcinomas demonstrated marginally significant differences at 765 nm (median, 0.67 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.78, respectively; p = 0.049).
In the high LDL group, the correlation was weaker and marginally significant ( r = -0.450, p = 0.049), with an R2 of 0.118 ( p = 0.150).
While there was no difference between groups at baseline or 6-months follow-up, the intervention arm had a marginally significant (p = 0.049) increase in the median SEAMS score over this period ( Table 4 ).
Results A positive/negative or suspected history of COVID-19 infection had marginally significant relationship with marital satisfaction (p=0.049).
There was a marginally significant effect of differences between compounds on the static phase of activity, F (3,58) = 2.77, p = .049, partial η 2 = 0.12.
marginally non-significantp -value = 0.049
Moreover, organizational commitment switched from marginally non-significant to marginally significant ( p -value = 0.049) in the regression related to CS, and perceived risks for the future turned out as significant in the regression on CF ( p -value = 0.021).
viciae was lower when the symbiont was present, a marginally significant difference ( Z = −1.96, P = 0.049; Table S2; Fig. 4 ).
The duodenal V33 Gy showed a marginally significant difference ( p -value = 0.049) between ground truth and plan recalculation.
There was a marginally significant effect of ROI on baseline alpha activity F (3, 66) = 3.583, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.140 ( Figure 5 ).
Among men, there was a marginally significant higher proportion of male Latino subjects with AH compared to Caucasians subjects (71.9% vs 56.2%, P = 0.049).
There was a marginally significant difference in proportions of females that paired with different types of males ( X 2 = 6.014, df = 2, p = 0.049): the females of both subspecies were more likely to pair with Amur wagtail males, while intermediate females were more likely to pair with Black-backed Wagtail males.
after: 0.78 ± 2.03, p -value < 0.001) were observed after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, while a marginally significant decrease was observed in time to laboratory test (before: 0.58 ± 1.57 vs. after: 0.56 ± 1.43, p -value = 0.049).
Moreover, although 5 s of S1 TPS induced a modest heterosynaptic facilitation of EPSP‐evoked CS bursting at S2 synapses in control experiments ( P CSB = 0.29) (Figure 8D ), EPSP‐evoked CS bursting during S2 TPS was enhanced when S1 and S2 TPS trains were delivered in the presence of ISO ( P CSB = 0.65), although this effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.049) (Figure 8E ).
The Group × Time interaction was marginally significant [ F (2,89.432 = 3.123, p = 0.049].
A marginally significant interaction effect was found for the interaction of Time × Agent [ F (1,22) = 4.35, p = 0.049], but no significant main effect of Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.49, p = 0.491] and no significant interaction effects of Advice × Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.10, p = 0.758], Advice × Time [ F (1,22) = 0.07, p = 0.798], and Advice × Time × Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.06, p = 0.811] were found.
There was a marginally significant improvement in 25-OH-D at 12 months in the LMF oil group [+ 1.46vs.-0.18 ng/ml, p = 0.049].
A marginally significant temporal trend of ASRIC was observed in urban areas (APC = 8.5%, 95% CI = 0.0 to 17.6%, P = 0.049).
Culture time beyond 24 h has no impact on the recovery or function of islets No overall trend between post-culture recovery of IEQs and culture time was observed p = 0.72 ( Figure 3A ), with a marginally significant trend observed with stimulation index ( p = 0.049) ( Figure 3B ).
These results were further confirmed by a linear mixed-effects ANOVA ( S1Table ), in which the epoch x inactivation interaction was marginally significant in the high-gamma band ( p = 0.049) with no other significant main or interaction effects (all other p > 0.05).
A negative binomial model with colour morph and site as factors detected a marginally significant divergence among sites in the relative numbers of each morph (interaction morph*site F 4,122 = 2.46, P = 0.049), with Anse Vata having slightly more black-and-white morphs than did the other sites.
In contrast, OM-S TTP was 1 week longer (4 (3–7) weeks) than SDP TTP (3 (1–5) weeks) in the 5-day arm; however, the difference was marginally significant (p=0.049) ( figure 2 ).
There was a marginally significant group by ADHD symptom interaction ( F (1,68) = 4.001, p = 0.049).
Wound infection was more common in right-sided cases at a marginally significant level ( P = 0.049).