Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0491.0× alphagold
If area of parapapillary beta zone was added as independent parameter, smaller beta zone was highly significantly ( P <0.001; standardized coefficient beta: −0.12; regression coefficient: −0.81 (95%CI): −1.06, −0.56) associated with a higher RNFL visibility score, while the association between a higher RNFL visibility score and absence of glaucoma became marginally significant ( P = 0.049).
marginally significantp=0.0491.0× alphagold
The current smoking status of the father was associated with a lower risk of UCVA <6/18 compared with participants with a father who never smoked (OR (95% CI), 0.94 (0.90 to 0.99); p=0.010), and also a marginally significant association between current smoking status of the father and the prevalence of UCVA <6/12 was observed (OR (95% CI), 0.97 (0.93 to 1.00); p=0.049).
marginally significantP=0.0491.0× alphagold
CGI methylation signature is not a strong prognostic indicator of RFS in lung ADCs To investigate the association of the CGI methylation signature of the present study with RFS, it was analyzed within the TCGA-450k set, which yielded a marginally significant difference in RFS between each risk group [33.9 vs. 27.0 months; P=0.049 (log-rank test); Fig. 2A ].
marginally significantp = .0491.0× alphagold
When the single sample from Sierra Leone (SL) was included in the analyses, only a marginally significant correlation between genetic distance and geographic distance was detected for F ST ( r = .45, p = .049, Mantel test) and for Rousset's distance ( r = .45, p = .052, Mantel test) (Figure S7 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Although the chi-square test indicated a marginally significant difference in reports of seeing someone smoking at school (χ2 = 3.8, p = 0.049), the odds ratio suggested that boys and girls were equally likely to report such exposure (OR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.000–1.186]).
marginally significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
Host category explained a modest proportion of the variation in community structure (R2 = 0.39) and showed a marginally significant effect (F = 1.580, p = 0.049), whereas host weight (R2 = 0.13, F = 1.061, p = 0.337) and sex (R2 = 0.09, F = 0.748, p = 0.774) were not significantly associated with microbial composition (Table 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0491.0× alphagold
In the comparison of the Backward Speech and No Speech condition, however, due to an overall increased pupil size in the Backward Speech condition we found a significant main effect of Language [ F (1, 23) = 6.629, p = 0.017, η 2 = 0.224], and only a marginally significant interaction of Language and Gaze [ F (1, 23) = 4.336, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.159].