“marginally significant”

Lower lumbar lordosis was marginally significant, with an OR of 0.981 (95% CI: 0.963–1.000, P = 0.049), suggesting that increased lower lumbar lordosis may be associated with decreased likelihood of surgical candidacy.

The IDI was marginally significant in the isolated valve surgery group (p=0.049).

Mixed-model regression analyses revealed no significant interaction between group and delay [X 2 (2) = 0.538, P = 0.76], and a marginally significant effect of delay across all animals, both lesioned and controls, [X 2 (1) = 3.866, P = 0.049].

A marginally significant trend was found for age, with students aged 25 years or above 25 years having higher median NK scores compared to their younger counterparts ( P = 0·049); however, no significant differences were found for the level of knowledge within each group.

Under DD, females had marginally significant higher overall activity than males (0.86 cm s −1 for females, 0.62 cm s −1 for males; GLMM P = 0.049).

Notably, in our study, the WAnT C condition showed a marginally significant advantage over the WAnT P condition in terms of RPM max ( p = 0.049) and AvPO ( p = 0.042), while PPO, POmin, and tPPO values remained similar.

While the main effect of condition was not significant ( F (1,24) = 1.88, p = 0.18, η p 2 = 0.08), the condition by age interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,24) = 4.31, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.16), suggesting that older adults’ performance was lower when emotional distractors were presented compared with neutral distractors ( F (12) = 5.46, p = 0.039, η p 2 = 0.33 ).

As a measure of optimism, the LOT-R shows its positive effect on the PSS-10 results with an estimate of 0.07 and a marginally significant p-value ( p = 0.049).

In the model including Persistence, a marginally significant interaction was observed prior to the application of robust standard errors ( β = −0.03, p = .049).

The association between DCU and category fluency was marginally significant (estimate = 0.02, p = 0.049).

The three-way interaction among site, treatment and client body size was marginally significant (N = 2 177 client interactions, GLMM: χ 2 = 3.86, p = 0.049; Fig. 2 , Supplementary Table S1 ): Cortisol-treated cleaners gave more TS to small clients than saline-treated cleaners but only in high social complexity habitats (Supplementary Figure S3 ).

In the high LDL group, the correlation was weaker and marginally significant ( r = -0.450, p = 0.049), with an R2 of 0.118 ( p = 0.150).

The 3-month negative-conversion rate was 52% (14/27) in the FMT group, and 24% (5/21) in the control group, showing a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.049) ( Figure 2 ).

In the right IFG, the main effect of Congruency was marginally significant [ F (1,19) = 4.42, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.19].

Moreover, although 5 s of S1 TPS induced a modest heterosynaptic facilitation of EPSP‐evoked CS bursting at S2 synapses in control experiments ( P CSB = 0.29) (Figure 8D ), EPSP‐evoked CS bursting during S2 TPS was enhanced when S1 and S2 TPS trains were delivered in the presence of ISO ( P CSB = 0.65), although this effect was marginally significant ( p = 0.049) (Figure 8E ).

A type-I error could possibly explain this unexpected and marginally significant result ( p = 0.049), or these observations may – at first glance – suggest that C. tamandua males are willing to undermine reproductive isolation.

The median time intervals between diagnosis and the receipt of different treatment modalities showed no significant changes, except for chemotherapy, which exhibited a marginally significant increase in the median time interval in 2021 compared to 2019 ( p = 0.049).

However, the association was marginally significant (p = 0.049).

Finally, the overall ANOVA for years of experience showed a marginally significant difference ( F = 2.402, p = 0.049), with post hoc tests indicating that nurses with 1–5 years of experience reported significantly higher perceived assertiveness than those with over 20 years of experience.

Although the Kruskal-Wallis test showed a marginally significant p CO 2 effect (p = 0.049; Table 2 ), the pairwise Dunn post-hoc test did not detect significant differences between the three p CO 2 treatments (p > 0.05).

In WA1 canola there was a marginally significant effect on yield ( P = 0.049, (conventional/LI)>control).

There was a marginally significant inverse association between lower LINE-1 methylation levels and increased TGCT risk, compared with healthy male relatives ( P = 0.049).

The CSF concentration ratio of Aβ 42 to Aβ 40 showed only a marginally significant ( p = 0.049), age-related increase ( Figure 1D ).

There was a marginally significant main effect with a medium effect size [F(1, 66) = 4.02, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.050; p bonf = 0.008] ( Figure 3 ).

Still, there was a marginally significant preference after a day (mean AUC = 0.51, t (82) = 1.99, p = 0.049), which did not remain significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted p = 0.056, q < 0.05).