“marginally significant”

Moreover, in patients who had experienced a previous stroke six months or more before randomization, there was a significant 47% reduction (HR 0.53; P = .0085) of fatal or nonfatal stroke and a marginally significant 28% reduction (HR 72; P = .0467) of the composite end point of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke (PROactive 04) [ 87 ].

The difference in CAD prevalence between the HPV-positive and negative groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.0467) and the OR for CAD was 3.74 for HPV-positive volunteers compared with HPV-negative women.

In addition to the three new compounds, significant (marginally significant in the CDS double knockdown lines) increases in compounds eluted at 7.83 min (peak 4) (19.7 ± 7.9 AU for the vector transformed controls; 14.3 ± 8.8 AU, p = 0.0468 for the CDS double knockdown lines; 13.2 ± 9.9 AU, p = 0.0053 for the 3’ UTR double knockdown lines) and 11.03 min (peak 6) (20.6 ± 6.8 AU for the vector transformed controls; 16.2 ± 8.6 AU, p = 0.0743 for the CDS double knockdown lines; 13.2 ± 7.6 AU, p = 0.0007 for the 3’ UTR double knockdown lines) were found in the double knockdown lines ( Fig 6B ).

A marginally significant difference in DFI according to AR status was shown in total ( p = 0.0468, more favorable DFI for AR-positive group than AR-negative group); however, the difference in DFI between AR-positive and -negative groups was even clearer in the ERβ-positive group ( p = 0.0285) but was lost in the ERβ-negative group ( p = 0.7734, Figure 4 ).

There was a marginally significant group x task interaction on the EDR frequency ( χ 2 (10) = 18.5, p = 0.0469).

In the group that required permanent pacemaker implantation, the baseline cycle length was 1080 ± 129.532 ms, while it was 764.13 ± 149.332 ms in the group without pacemaker implantation, which was marginally significant (p = 0.047).

Johnson & Johnson p‐tau217+ also showed a marginally significant inverse relationship, with R of −0.14 ( p = 0.047), (Figure S2 ).

A marginally significant difference ( p = 0.047) was observed between the cases and controls regarding tobacco use as there were more smokers (26.19%) in the case group compared to the healthy control group (15.83%).

Although the effect of randomization order was not statistically significant in most conditions, it showed a marginally significant effect in the ipsilesional parietal cortex during the grasp ( p = 0.047).

The result showed that a longer period of POD use was a negative and marginally significant (B=−0.757, S.E.=0.381, p =0.047) predictor of POD contamination.

Also, medical doctors had a higher mean practice score than those in the “others” category with a marginally significant post hoc analysis test (p =0.047).

There was also a significant effect of signal-to-noise ratio (F(8,56) = 4.359, p = 0.001, ƞ 2 = 0.384) and a marginally significant interaction between the two factors (F(8,56) = 2.139, p = 0.047, ƞ 2 = 0.234).

A statistically significant linear increase across the repeated runs was found in the PCC ( R 2 = 0.234, p = 8.89 × 10 −7 ), left insula ( R 2 = 0.107, p = 1.39 × 10 −3 ), and right insula ( R 2 = 0.132, p = 3.47 × 10 −4 ) and marginally significant in the ACC ( R 2 = 0.043, p = 0.047).

While naringenin administration to propofol-treated mice showed mean time 16.7±1.5 s which was statistically not significant to propofol group (P > 0.05) yet marginally significant as compared to control (P = 0.047).

The Prognostic Nutritional Index emerged as a marginally significant protective factor (OR = 0.925 [0.857–0.999], p = 0.047), with each 1-point increase associated with a 7.5% reduction in mortality odds.

In a linear regression model including all covariates, years of employment was not significant ( p = 0.908), whereas age was marginally significant ( p = 0.047).

At baseline, there was a marginally significant difference in one-way ANOVA regarding attitudes towards eMHSs for stress coping, with a small ES ( F (3,447) = 2.67, p = 0.047, ŋ p 2 = .02; d = 0.29).

In addition, in the present study, we found a marginally significant increasing breast density with vitamin D intake (p-value = 0.047).

Posthoc one‐sample t ‐test showed significant or marginally significant results for the real iTBS condition (3T, t 18 = −2.13, p = .047; 3 T2D, t 18 = −2.07, p = .053; 5T, t 18 = −3.10, p = .006), but no significant effects for the sham iTBS condition (3T, t 18 = −0.53, p = .604; 3 T2D, t 18 = 0.69, p = .499; 5T, t 18 = 1.57, p = .133; Figure 3 , panel b).

However, a marginally significant difference was observed, with nonexpressers exhibiting a higher elevation in SCr at 1 week post‐transplantation ( p = 0.047). 3.3.

ANOVA also revealed a marginally significant difference for the hydrogen contents ( P < 0.047; Table 2 ), again in favor of MG38 (6.7% dry weight) compared to MIDAS (6.5% dry weight; Table 3 ).

CUHL reported significantly greater levels of fatigue than CNH in the Cognitive domain only, and this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.047).

With one-tailed test, the association between Proprioceptive and Spatial span showed a weak, and marginally significant correlation ( r = .212, p = .047), while Bayesian analysis did not favour the null or the alternative hypothesis (BF 10 = 2.312).

However, the main effect for hearing aid use was marginally significant [Wilk's λ = 0.998, F (2,3,857) = 3.06, p = 0.047, η 2 = 0.002].

A marginally significant association suggested that less experienced clinicians perceived AI as a potential threat (Q18; χ 2 = 7.95, p =0.047) ( Table 1 ).