“marginally significant”

Physical activity showed a marginally significant inverse association with nicotine dependence in smokers (OR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.88–1.00, p = 0.047), with a threshold of 4.26 METs-hour per day, and showed a marginally significant direct association with nicotine dependence over the threshold (OR = 1.02, 95%CI: 1.01–1.03, p = 0.005) ( Table S3 ).

Comparing fast and slow problem solvers It should be noted that a one-way ANOVA on solution rates revealed a marginally significant difference between the fast and slow solvers, F (1, 45) = 4.189, p =.047, where fast solvers were slightly less accurate ( M = .62) than slow solvers ( M = .71) in their responses.

In addition, in the present study, we found a marginally significant increasing breast density with vitamin D intake (p-value = 0.047).

A marginally significant difference ( p = 0.047) was observed between the cases and controls regarding tobacco use as there were more smokers (26.19%) in the case group compared to the healthy control group (15.83%).

The resistance differences were largely due to the relatively long knockdown times (i.e., higher resistances) of the Darwin, Alice Springs and Sydney populations (on average, 32% longer than those of the other populations). Regressing the median knockdown time against the five key weather variables yielded one significant association, a positive association with the minimum temperature of the coldest month, and this was marginally significant ( t 10 = 2.26, P = 0.047).

A statistically significant linear increase across the repeated runs was found in the PCC ( R 2 = 0.234, p = 8.89 × 10 −7 ), left insula ( R 2 = 0.107, p = 1.39 × 10 −3 ), and right insula ( R 2 = 0.132, p = 3.47 × 10 −4 ) and marginally significant in the ACC ( R 2 = 0.043, p = 0.047).

While naringenin administration to propofol-treated mice showed mean time 16.7±1.5 s which was statistically not significant to propofol group (P > 0.05) yet marginally significant as compared to control (P = 0.047).

However, there was a marginally significant trend towards a higher prevalence of hazardous/harmful drinking among migrants, particularly late migrants (20.9% versus 24.3% versus 29.7%, P = 0.047).

CUHL reported significantly greater levels of fatigue than CNH in the Cognitive domain only, and this difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.047).

With one-tailed test, the association between Proprioceptive and Spatial span showed a weak, and marginally significant correlation ( r = .212, p = .047), while Bayesian analysis did not favour the null or the alternative hypothesis (BF 10 = 2.312).

Differences in diastolic blood pressure and 3MSE scores were marginally significant ( p = 0.047 and p = 0.044, respectively).

The normalized time differences were normally distributed (W = .971, p = .516), and a marginally significant increase was observed (t = 1.942, p = .047).

Johnson & Johnson p‐tau217+ also showed a marginally significant inverse relationship, with R of −0.14 ( p = 0.047), (Figure S2 ).

In these analyses we observed a marginally significant Condition x Trial n Correspondence x Experiment interaction, F 1,38 = 4.21, p = 0.047, η p 2 = 0.10.

major (F (6,237) = 1.702, p = 0.121) , yet this interaction was marginally significant in L. turanica (F (6,216) = 2.17, p = 0.047).

The numbers of internodes after 508 days did not differ significantly (F = 2.111, df = 3.717, p = 0.915) ( Figure 6 C), whereas differences in the total length after 508 days were marginally significant (F = 41.311, df = 3.717, p = 0.047) ( Figure 6 D).

However, the main effect for hearing aid use was marginally significant [Wilk's λ = 0.998, F (2,3,857) = 3.06, p = 0.047, η 2 = 0.002].

violacea displaying a marginally significant negative trend (slope = −5.630, R 2 = 0.079, p = 0.047).

Greater sKIT change (either as a categorical or continuous variable) and age < 65 (noting that this group represented 98% of patients) were significantly associated with improved OS in the multivariate analyses (p = 0.0085, < 0.0001, and = 0.0045, respectively), while greater VEGF-A change (categorical variable) and age evaluated as a continuous variable showed marginally significant associations (both p = 0.047).

The addition of gender to the model showed no significant effect, but adding insulin resulted in a marginally significant interaction term time*insulin -0.2255 (p = 0.047).

At T1, there was a marginally significant difference in the prevalence of depression in females versus males (55.1 vs. 42.7%; p = 0.047), but no significant differences in anxiety and insomnia between these 2 groups (Table 2 ).

Age-based matching in choosing cases and controls had a marginally significant impact ( P = .047): properly matched studies reported a higher ES (6.77 [95% CI 3.65–12.55]) than studies with unclear (2.13 [95% CI 1.05–4.33]) or no matching (3.16 [95% CI 1.38–7.23]).

The ToD × Trial Type interaction was marginally significant after co-varying for pulse-alone amplitude ( F (1.64, 51.03) = 3.49, p = 0.047, ηp 2 = 0.101); it became non-significant after covarying for schizotypy ( F (1.70, 54.38) = 1.85, p = 0.173, ηp 2 = 0.055) though there was no main effect or any interaction involving Schizotypy.

The magnitude of pain reduction in the entire cohort treated with LMWF-5A was 42% from baseline and the treatment effect compared with vehicle control (estimated difference in WOMAC pain, −0.25; P =0.004) was also notable, especially relative to a previously reported study of hyaluronic acid, in which only a marginally significant treatment effect was observed (mean difference in WOMAC pain compared with control, −0.15; P =0.047).

There was marginally significant difference between participants recruited from KI and UCLA [ t (195) = − 1.99, p = .047).