“marginally significant”

The difference in the median 5-year DFS in the Her2+ cohort was marginally significant (57.23 months 95% CI [53.86–60.60] in the TM group vs 43.41 months 95% CI [34.19–52.64] in the IR group; P = 0.046; Fig. 5 D).

We observed a marginally significant between groups effect on social cognition FU scores ( F [1,25] = 4.45, P = 0.046), while controlling for T0 performance ( F [1,25] = 4.08, P = 0.055).

For the period from March 2019 to March 2020, there was a marginally significant linear trend in proportion of donations to charity, F (1, 51) = 4.20, p = 0.046, but inspection of the plot revealed that this was probably a spurious effect due to the presence of a peak caused by a charity campaign in March.

The difference in R 0 between control subjects and emphysematous CAL is marginally significant ( p = 0.046), but no statistically different difference was found between the control subjects and non-emphysematous CAL.

This latent dimension of physical robustness was associated with a specific brain pattern of CT and a specific brain pattern of GMV ( Fig 3 ), though the statistical comparison showed a marginally significant Spearman correlation indicating that they do share variance ( r = 0.41, p = 0.046).

In contrast with canal fill in stem tip area, midstem fill was found to be negatively associated with stem migration, with the difference found marginally significant (β=-0.36, p=0.046).

Although individual comparisons at the level of individual gene loci failed to reach statistical significance (Fisher test, p > 0.05 for each gene locus), a marginally significant improvement in overall knock-in efficiency was seen when considering all the gene loci together (Chi squared, p = 0.046, Supplementary Table 6 ), although the large variability in efficiency caused by gene locus complicates this analysis approach (see below for a more rigorous approach).

phagocytophilum positives were higher in temperature, the result was marginally significant ( p = 0.046).

Twelve studies including 1,178 patients assessed the incidence of thromboembolic events, and more events were found in the AA group; however, the results were marginally significant (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.01–2.15, P = 0.046).

Learning level of bees was not affected by Roundup or glyphosate (glmmTMB: χ 2 2 =2.13, P = 0.35), but body size did have a marginally significant effect (glmmTMB: χ 2 1 =4, P =0.046), where smaller bees from all three treatments were more likely to have a learnt response.

Although the initial linear coefficient was marginally significant ( p = 0.046), the overall response surface declined with dose, and the model identified 0 minutes as the optimal UV A+B exposure.

Generally speaking, the blocking of PBMCs infection by anti-TpUB05 antiserum was marginally significant ( p < 0.046) using Friedman test.

There were also two marginally significant main effects in R. rattus ; mean helminth species richness was lower at Bangsar compared with Chow Kit (Table 5 , F 1, 336 = 4.03, P = 0.046), and increased with age, but then leveled off in age class 3 ( F 1, 336 = 3.23, P = 0.041, values in age classes 1-3, = 1.18 ± 0.145, 1.69 ± 0.092, 1.53 ± 0.087, respectively).

Although the average rate for 2007–2012 was higher than 2001–2006, there was a significant decreasing trend averaging 2.2% per year despite an increase from 2011 to 2012 (Figure 1 ). Age-Specific Hospitalization Rates During 1994–2000, annual rates did not change significantly within any age group, except for a marginally significant decrease in the 40–49 age group ( P = .046) ( Supplementary Table 1 ).

While fluoxetine yielded a modest reduction in FBS, the effect was marginally significant (WMD: − 8.70 mg/dL; 95% CI: − 17.25 to − 0.14; p = 0.046), with substantial heterogeneity observed (I2 = 92%, p < 0.001).

The single exception was a marginally significant treatment by subgroup interaction for the subgroup of onset of asthma for FEV 1 AUC 0–6 ( p = 0.0463); however, this study was not powered to assess whether all subjects with more severe asthma and low lung function (FEV 1 <45 % predicted) would benefit from the regime.

This difference in the number of cases between the two groups was marginally significant, according to the z-test ( p -value = 0.04636).

A significant increase in the relative proportion of trisomic cells having at least one micronucleus was observed at timepoint 2 compared to timepoint 1 (P = 0.0186), with a marginally significant value being noted for the disomic cells (P = 0.0464) ( Table 3 ).

When the clusters were collapsed into their respective subset, the naïve subset maintained a marginally significant increase in frequency in the Stage 1 T1D individuals ( P = 0.0464), while the plasmablast subset maintained a significant decrease in cell frequency in Stage 1 individuals compared to healthy controls ( P = 0.0190) ( Fig.

In linear regression models, the interaction term (daily dosage in 10-mg increments x long-acting opioid) was statistically significant in models for BPI-I (p<0.0001) and VR-12 physical (p = 0.0029), and marginally significant for VR-12 mental (p = 0.0466).

An rmANOVA assessing the impact of plugging in the NH group and three‐way ANOVA comparing NH‐plug to SSD revealed SNR was a marginally significant factor only between the latter groups ( p = 0.0467), and TargAz, SNR (for NH group) and interactions were not significant factors influencing total displacement ( p > 0.1527).

2F ), direct t -test comparison of vehicle and modGinA in trial 3 indicated a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.0467) (Figure.

The average levels of amylase and lipase in plasma were lower than those in the control group, although the difference was marginally significant (p=0.0467 and 0.1137) ( Fig.

Distance (HaversineKM) from the putative infestation origin at the Sweetwater Reserve had a marginally significant negative effect on damage severity (Estimate = –0.1045, SE = 0.0525, P = 0.0467), suggesting that palms located at increasing distances from the Sweetwater Reserve were at slightly less risk of attack and were less likely to exhibit visual damage.

The difference in CAD prevalence between the HPV-positive and negative groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.0467) and the OR for CAD was 3.74 for HPV-positive volunteers compared with HPV-negative women.