Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP =0.0460.9× alphagold
When considering counts with zero values excluded, females reared at 35°C had significantly reduced fecundity (two-way ANOVA: F 1,254 =65.883, P <0.001) and total number of offspring ( F 1,221 =78.891, P <0.001), with a marginally significant effect of female rearing temperature on the proportion of eggs that hatched ( F 1,221 =4.1074, P =0.046; Fig. 5 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
the variability in intercepts and slope of the units) were tested and it was found that a substantial amount of variance could be attributed to the differences in intercepts of the units (the intraclass correlation was = 0.30, marginally significant at p = 0.046).
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
There were also two marginally significant main effects in R. rattus ; mean helminth species richness was lower at Bangsar compared with Chow Kit (Table 5 , F 1, 336 = 4.03, P = 0.046), and increased with age, but then leveled off in age class 3 ( F 1, 336 = 3.23, P = 0.041, values in age classes 1-3, = 1.18 ± 0.145, 1.69 ± 0.092, 1.53 ± 0.087, respectively).
marginally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Interestingly, we observed that frequencies of CD4 + CD28 null T cells showed a moderate correlation with both maximum CRP values after surgery (r = 0.214; p = 0.020) and a marginally significant correlation with the total leucocyte count after surgery (r = 0.185; p = 0.046) (Table 2 ).
marginally significantP = 0.0460.9× alphagold
Our best explanation is that this result may be due simply to the small sample size (N = 10), although even with this small sample, finding that only 3 (30%) colonies that scored as Africanized rather than the expected 60.85%, as found in our large sample of San Diego County foraging workers is marginally significant ( χ 2 = 3.995, P = 0.046).
marginally significantp = 0.0460.9× alphagold
highly significantqualifiedgold
( Figure 1B ) Between the two groups, we performed the global tests for the paired difference of the proportion of CNAs for each locus across the genome, and showed highly significant difference in gains (<0.0001) and a marginally significant difference in losses (p = 0.046) after accounting for multiple comparisons.