“marginally significant”

However, gender appeared marginally significant only in the left UNC FA with male having higher levels than females (β = 0.32, p = 0.046).

Moreover, there was a marginally significant difference in the EQ-5D utility score [χ2 (2) = 7.988, p = 0.046] across the various monthly income levels.

A mixed-design Group × interference type (VR-C, VR-D, or AR-D) ANOVA on counting accuracy showed that participants’ performance in the counting task was not significantly different among groups, F (2,19) = 1.74, MSE = .01, p = .203, η 2 = .001, or the interference types, F (2,38) = 1.20, MSE = .01, p = .313, η 2 = .05, while the Group × interference type interaction was marginally significant, F (4,38) = 2.68, MSE = .01, p = .046, η 2 = .21.

In the case of the stygobiotic species (Figure 4 d–f), we found a marginally significant correlation between interspring geographical distances and overall species dissimilarity (ßsor, r = .298, p = .046), whereas no correlation was found for the pure turnover component or the nestedness component (r = .123, p = .204 for ßsim and r = .047, p = .367 for ßnest, respectively).

Furthermore, a marginally significant association between sex and disease duration was observed (p = 0.046, Fig. 1 B).

A marginally significant main effect of group was found, F (5.186,1) = 4.114, p = 0.046 η2 = 0.057, while a significant main effect of the time of assessment was also shown, F (7.390,2) = 10.109, p < 0.0001, η2 = 0.129.

The multivariate analysis revealed that age, PS and the presence of CEACAM5 mRNA-positive CTCs (marginally significant) were independent prognostic factors associated with decreased overall survival (HR = 1.4; 95% CI: 1.0–1.9; p = 0.046; HR = 3.3; 95% CI: 2.0–5.6; p < 0.001 and HR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.0–2.8; p = 0.056; Table 3 ). 4.

In male subjects, the slope of the regression line fitted to data from subjects with 0 AGG interruptions showed a marginally significant difference from the slope of the regression line fitted to data from subjects with 1 interruption (P = 0.046); no other significant differences in slopes or intercepts of regression lines were seen for male or female subjects.

Sex-by-education interaction was marginally significant (p = 0.046).

Notably, the association was slightly attenuated in individuals with a history of stroke (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.95–1.98) compared with those without (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.66–2.10), with a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.046).

There was a marginally significant effect of noise on maximum distance (i.e., gesture size), χ 2 (2) = 6.16, p = 0.046.

In the case of perceived prevalence of smoking among same age peers, although the interaction term was marginally significant (B perceived prevalence of smoking × smoking status = .019, p = .046), the 95% CIs were in the range of zero (.000 to .037), thus the interaction was deemed non-significant.

In the whole population, the “older” group has a higher proportion of stereo-negatives, which is marginally significant (p = 0.046 for “older” vs. “visually developing”, p = 0.03 for “older” vs. “visually mature”, bootstrap resampling), but this difference vanishes if we consider only the sub-population without visual problems.

In addition to the expected large effect of stim ( F (1,44) = 83.29, p = 1.04e-11), we observed a marginally significant stim × cond interaction ( F (1,44) = 4.22, p = 0.046); no other effect was significant.

Histopathological analysis Histopathological analysis revealed marginally significant differences across groups in duodenal inflammation severity (KW H = 5.833, p = 0.046) and colonic inflammation type (H = 5.333, p = 0.041).

the variability in intercepts and slope of the units) were tested and it was found that a substantial amount of variance could be attributed to the differences in intercepts of the units (the intraclass correlation was = 0.30, marginally significant at p = 0.046).

This latent dimension of physical robustness was associated with a specific brain pattern of CT and a specific brain pattern of GMV ( Fig 3 ), though the statistical comparison showed a marginally significant Spearman correlation indicating that they do share variance ( r = 0.41, p = 0.046).

The genotypic distribution of rs2239547 in ITIH4 showed a marginally significant difference between patients with schizophrenia and controls (p = 0.046); however, this association did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction (adjusted significance threshold, p < 0.016).

When considering counts with zero values excluded, females reared at 35°C had significantly reduced fecundity (two-way ANOVA: F 1,254 =65.883, P <0.001) and total number of offspring ( F 1,221 =78.891, P <0.001), with a marginally significant effect of female rearing temperature on the proportion of eggs that hatched ( F 1,221 =4.1074, P =0.046; Fig. 5 ).

While fluoxetine yielded a modest reduction in FBS, the effect was marginally significant (WMD: − 8.70 mg/dL; 95% CI: − 17.25 to − 0.14; p = 0.046), with substantial heterogeneity observed (I2 = 92%, p < 0.001).

26 Notably, while patients with PCI had significantly worse 90-day mRS scores than those with ACI in the unmatched cohort ( Supplemental Table 1 ), this difference was attenuated after matching, remaining marginally significant ( p = 0.046).

All variables show statistically significant improvements post-intervention ( p < 0.05), except caregiving Stress, which is marginally significant ( p ≈ 0.046) (Table 1 ).

Surprisingly, albumin is no longer an independent predictor of OS, and age is a marginally significant predictor of OS ( p = 0.046), conflicting with a recent study [ 36 ].

After adjustment for demographic factors in Model 2, sleep onset time was found to be marginally significant (FR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86–1.00, p = 0.046), although the Holm-Bonferroni adjusted p -value ( p = 0.093) indicated that this result may not be statistically robust.

An ADD-EDD difference of 8 to 14 days was marginally significant (ARR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.00–1.44, p = 0.046).