“marginally significant”

However, the model exhibited a marginally significant lack of fit ( p -value = 0.045).

After dividing the fatty acid into three equal parts (Table S1 ), only DPA showed a significant positive association in the high tertile ( β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.1, p = 0.014), while DHA exhibited a marginally significant negative association in the high tertile ( β = −0.05, 95% CI: −0.09 to < −0.01, p = 0.045).

Cancerous and paracancerous normal tissues from patients at different stages of cancer development and progression had a similar level of CASP8 mRNA expression ( Figure 4 ), although cancerous tissues from patients at T4 stage had a marginally significant higher mRNA expression than paired paracancerous normal tissues ( P = 0.045; Figure 4c ).

During the acquisition phase, no significant difference was obtained between the two identical objects, except for one particular case in Acute Stimulation study with low-frequency stimulation at 400μA, and the effect was marginally significant at p=0.045.

As shown in Figure 5a , while the percentages of Ki67-positive cells were very similar between MMTV-ErbB2 mice and MMTV-ErbB2;E2f1 −/− mice, there was a marginally significant decrease in percentages of Ki67-positive cells in MMTV-ErbB2;Wap-Cre;E2f3 −/loxP mice than in ErbB2 mice (3.6% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.045).

There was a marginally significant correlation between measurements from the two particle counters when using raw data ( r = 0.375, P = 0.045) ( Figure 1 ).

No significant changes were also observed for GluA1 Ser 831 phosphorylation in FS-stress animals at different time points (interaction term p = 0.15, Figure 1(c) ), despite single comparison at 2 hours after stress had a marginally significant effect (FC = 0.78; p = 0.045).

Further, there was a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.045, independent samples t -test) in the number of different transcripts amplified in individuals of the older allopolyploid D. majalis (average 230) and the cDNA markers in the younger D. traunsteineri and D. ebudensis (average 221).

While the ALT levels remained unchanged ( Figures 3A, B ), AST levels showed a marginally significant increase in the fatty + MDDP group compared to the fatty control group, indicating a potential hemolytic process resulting from MDDP treatment ( p = 0.045).

However, there was a marginally significant increase in alcohol consumption over a 30-day period from pre-, mid-, to post-treatment ( F (2,295) = 3.1, p = 0.045, η p 2 = 0.010).

Finally, while residency (in-state vs out-of-state) was not statistically significant in the respondents only model it became marginally significant (p-value = 0.0451) in the completed-data model.

On the other hand, we detected a significant difference in ACM on 14th day between isolates of different genera (χ 2 (2) = 18.423, p = 0.0001), isolates isolated from a meadow versus a field (F 1,57 = 7.182, p = 0.0096), and marginally significant differences in ACM of isolates from an adult insect host versus larvae (χ 2 (1) = 4.0098, p = 0.0452) and from a Lepidoptera insect host versus a Coleoptera (χ 2 (1) = 4.1391, p = 0.0419). 2.3.

The results of this analysis also indicated a marginally significant main effect of sex ( p < 0.0456) suggestive of a slightly smaller heterotopia volume in the brains of female offspring relative to males, with no dose X sex interaction ( p > 0.82).

When the data were analyzed in terms of sampling date, the traps showed a marginally significant difference on August 19 (χ2 = 6.2, df = 2; P = 0.0457) and September 2 (χ2 = 6.0, df = 2, P = 0.0495) but not on August 10 (χ2 = 2.9, df = 2, P = 0.2301) and August 26 (χ2 = 0.00, df = 2; P = 1.0000) (Fig. 2 b).

The PXS-PGS interaction term was marginally significant ( P = 0.0457) but increased predictive value by only 0.001 (C-statistic 0.777 [95% CI 0.765, 0.789]).

There was no significant difference between the percentages of ASY from areas 1 (December) and area 2 (January), but a marginally significant difference was observed between the proportions of areas 1 and 2 when September and January were compared (OR 1.8, CI 1.026–3.112, p = 0.0459).

In controls ( Supplementary Table S1 ; Figure 2 A), AT1-AAs showed moderate correlations with AT2-AAs (r s = 0.367, 95% CI: 0.173–0.533, p < 0.001) and MasR-AAs (r s = 0.341, 95% CI: 0.139–0.515, p = 0.001), while its correlation with ACE2-AAs was weaker and marginally significant (r s = 0.204, 95% CI: −0.002–0.394, p = 0.046).

In the males, diagnosis was marginally significant in POND ( H (3) = 2.68, p = .046, η 2 = 0.02) but not significant in HBN ( H (3) = 1.79, p = .149, η 2 = 0.01). 3.2.

More detailed analysis (Figure 2 ), shows a significant interaction of candidate and examiner ethnicity for communication skills and ethics ( p = 0.003), a marginally significant effect for the respiratory station ( p = 0.046), and a marginally non-significant effect for history-taking ( p = 0.078).

( Figure 1B ) Between the two groups, we performed the global tests for the paired difference of the proportion of CNAs for each locus across the genome, and showed highly significant difference in gains (<0.0001) and a marginally significant difference in losses (p = 0.046) after accounting for multiple comparisons.

The difference in the median 5-year DFS in the Her2+ cohort was marginally significant (57.23 months 95% CI [53.86–60.60] in the TM group vs 43.41 months 95% CI [34.19–52.64] in the IR group; P = 0.046; Fig. 5 D).

ARID5B variants (rs2588969 and rs494288) showed marginally significant association with LOAD in meta-analysis of 2,634 LOAD and 4,201 controls ( P = 0.046 and 0.008, respectively), although the associations did not survive adjustment for covariates ( P = 0.30 and 0.11, respectively).[ 19 ] Other inconclusive association of ARID5B variants included Naj et al.

Although the initial linear coefficient was marginally significant ( p = 0.046), the overall response surface declined with dose, and the model identified 0 minutes as the optimal UV A+B exposure.

Current SGA use was a marginally significant covariate of Y v ( F = 4.06, p = 0.046 ) but not CBF or CMRO 2 .

The insignificant relationship between stomatal size and petiole vascular area was marginally significant after including a phylogenetic relationship ( F = 4.40, P = 0.046; Table 1 ).