“marginally significant”

However, only two of these associations were marginally significant: in high grade (pG3) tumors (OR, 0.54; 95% c.i., 0.29–1.00; p = 0.042), and in PR negative tumors (OR, 0.58; 95% c.i., 0.33–1.01; p < 0.05; Figure 2 ). 2.5.

Although the main effect of genotype is marginally significant according to one of the four analyses—performed on the 16 genotypes present across the two growth-chamber environments—this effect is non-significant ( p = 0.042) after correcting for multiple comparisons (adjusted FDR critical p ≤ 0.0125).

The smallest magnitude of difference was observed between TLSD and TTCD2, with TLSD being only 0.5 dB lower ( p = 0.042, marginally significant).

There was also a marginally significant main effect of Face Ethnicity, F (1, 78) = 4.29, p = 0.042 η 2 p = 0.01; the European Face’s Eyes and Nose were examined for a greater percent of time (mean dwell time = 28.0%) than those of the African Face (mean dwell time = 25.5%).

For the Barthel Index, both at discharge and follow-up, marginally significant differences were observed (U = 679.5, Z = −2.029, p = 0.042 and U = 692.5, Z = −2.001, p = 0.045, respectively).

We observed a worse overall survival rate that was marginally significant in AML patients showing high levels of miR-181b-5p (p = 0.042; log-rank test) ( Fig. 3G ).

The prevalence of malaria was higher among males (14.90%) than females (8.98%), though the difference was marginally significant (p = 0.042).

1 This study achieved the first proof of concept of epigenetic cancer risk diagnosis in any type of cancer but, due to the short follow-up period, a relatively small number of events were observed, resulting in a marginally significant difference (p=0.042).

Size does not significantly differ either between sexes ( p = 0.094) or lineages ( p = 0.812), although their interaction is marginally significant ( p = 0.042): Western males are slightly smaller than Western females, while Eastern Montseny brook newts do not differ between sexes ( Table 5 ).

The best-fitting model predicting the Bayley-III Cognitive Index included theta modulation index at 6 months , absolute theta power at 6 months, and age at outcome as predictors (F(3, 55) = 2.92), and was marginally significant (p = 0.042), explaining 13.7 % of the variance in the dependent variable (R 2 = 0.137, adjusted R 2 = 0.090).

Among the 255 children suppressed at enrollment, more FCCM versus SOC children (98.0% versus 95.3%) were suppressed at 12-months, but this was not statistically significant in mITT or weighted mITT analyses, with a marginally significant difference using imputed mITT analysis (p = 0.042).

In addition, association of nuclear cataracts with the TT genotype of rs7543472 is marginally significant at p<0.042 and suggestive with the TT genotype of rs3754334 at p<0.06.

While stimulus direction alone did not predict displacement ( F 3,152 = 1.12, p = 0.34), the interaction between stimulus direction and condition was marginally significant ( F 3,152 = 2.80, p = 0.042).

For Russian, the human baseline was marginally significant ( B = −0.582, p = 0.042, OR = 0.56), indicating slightly lower odds of correct responses.

The correlation between sensitivity and conservation was marginally significant (Spearman ρ ; p = 0.042).

The association between sleep-duration PRS and BD-II was marginally significant (RR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.00-1.12]; P = .042 [PRS P T <1.00]).

The IHLC was positively correlated with PHLC and this relationship was marginally significant in Form A ( p = .042) and significant in Form B ( p = .001).

Although PWI had a marginally significant effect on cell density in the NAc (Two-way ANOVA: F(1, 36) = 4.448, p = 0.042 for the PWI effect), post-hoc analysis revealed no significant differences between GH and PWI groups in females ( p = 0.059) or males ( p = 0.726) (Fig. 1 I and K).

GDF15 was associated with VAT independent of age, sex, ethnicity, and BMIz ( P = 0.008), but after adjustment for intrahepatic fat content, the association became marginally significant ( P = 0.042).

The difference was marginally significant ( p =0.042).

The slope of the psychometric function (Model 1b, see Methods), did show a main effect of test moment (F 1,80 = 30.09, p < 0.0001), and stimulus type (F 2,80 = 44.79, p < 0.0001), and a marginally significant interaction effect (F 2,80 = 3.31, p = 0.042).

There was a marginally significant trend toward internal nest-cup depths being shallower as temperatures increased with decreasing latitude ( F 3,57 = 4.32, P = 0.042, Fig. 3 E), with post-hoc tests revealing no significant differences between any of the individual study sites (all P values >0.05).

The REML model showed no significant association ( p -value = 0.95, β = 0.02; 95% CI [−0.55, 0.58]), but the fixed-effect model indicated a marginally significant negative association ( p -value = 0.042, β = −0.0035).

Additionally, there was a marginally significant association between believing that the vaccines are effective against early circulating strains and increased vaccine acceptance ( p = 0.042, OR = 3.56, 95% CI: 1.04–12.1).

While this effect was not significant within groups ( glm for dark/light: z = 1.608, p = 0.108; and narrow/wide: z = 0.946, p = 0.344), it was marginally significant when data from both weak preference trials were pooled ( lme: z = 2.034, p = 0.042).