“marginally significant”

However, a comparison of haplotype frequencies between samples [4, 5] and [6–11] was marginally significant ( F CT = 0.016, P = 0.041, df = 1), but not for frequencies plus haplotype divergences (Φ SC = 0.005, P = 0.432, df = 1).

Comparison of GM_n across different DWMH Fazekas scores Kruskal–Wallis testing revealed a marginally significant group-level difference in GM_n across DWMH Fazekas scores ( p = 0.041).

Moreover, though a marginally significant difference of rs3095661 alleles was found between controls and cases ( P = 0.041, Table 2 ), no significant difference of rs3095661 genotypes was found in the four models between controls and cases ( P = 0.362, P = 0.066, P = 0.999, P = 0.197, respectively, Table 3 ).

Feeding guild was marginally significant in explaining heterogeneity in the data ( I 2 = 93.01, Q M = 14.66, df = 7, p = 0.041; marginal R 2 = 0.015), but only root herbivores (with 4 data points) showed a significant negative effect size (Figure S1 ).

The second SNP, rs9493627, replicated in the UK Biobank (p = 0.0095), the other GERA race/ethnicity groups (p = 0.0080), and was marginally significant and in the correct direction for SRT (p = 0.041) and suggestively so for SDS (p = 0.081).

In the relative log(biomass) model (also R 2 = 0.10), the interaction between seed mass and the squared term for heterospecific density was marginally significant ( P = 0.041, Table 4 ) and indicated that light-seeded species exhibited a shallow hump-shaped relationship with heterospecific density whereas heavy-seeded species exhibited a shallow U-shaped relationship (Fig.

The association was marginally significant among participants with obesity (1.11 [1.00, 1.23], p = 0.041).

The differences in mean MAFs between tissues were marginally significant between male and female leaves (Mann–Whitney U test, top eQTL, P = 0.041; random eQTL, P = 0.049) and between female leaves and pollen in top eQTLs ( P = 0.049) ( Fig. 4 ).

In cross-sectional normative models (C-Norms), marginally significant group differences were found among negative deviators at the 2-year follow-up in the left occipital (H(4) = 9.96, p = 0.041) and parietal (H(4) = 14.38, p = 0.0062) lobes; Dunn’s post-hoc tests suggested a mid- vs. late-pubertal group difference in the parietal lobe ( p = 0.0053) but not in any of the pubertal stages for the occipital lobe (min p = 0.139 for mid- vs. late-pubertal).

There were marginally significant interactions between visit and age (visit*age-group: F (3,71) = 2.89, p = 0.041) and visit, age and TV-group (visit*age-group*TV-group: F (6,71) = 2.30, p = 0.044).

We found a marginally significant association ( P = 0.041) of radiotherapy with worse survival for all-stage patients in univariate model, but this association turned insignificant in multivariate model.

Yet, there was a marginally significant improvement in PFS with atezolizumab compared with placebo in the ITT population [hazard ratio (HR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69 to 0.99; P=0.041; median PFS 13.5 vs. 11.3 months, respectively].

Player hours in previous season is marginally significant (p=0.041).

Moreover, the OS was longer in the PN group (21.71 ± 5.82 months) than in the PP group (20.01 ± 5.18 months), although the difference was marginally significant (t = 2213.5, P = 0.041).

The Pearson correlation analysis showed marginally significant ( p = 0.041–0.076) moderate correlations between the working time values determined using ISO 4049 and FTIR (Fig. 4 ).

Tajima's D was marginally significant at three locations and in the pooled sample ( D = −1.452, p = 0.041).

Interestingly, while no significant relationship was found between CD47 and the clinical factors studied, a marginally significant trend was observed between higher IPI scores and increased EBV positivity (p = 0.041).

A marginally significant interaction with dose was also detected ( P = 0.0411), suggesting some divergence between AA and Aa genotypes at higher doses (data not presented).

Pregnancy IVF outcome was a statistically significant factor influencing LH profile (F=3.73, p=0.0261) ( Figure 2A ); whereas, protocol treatment group was marginally significant (F=4.23, p=0.0411).

This was further supported by a Type III analysis of variance, which showed no significant effect for physician status (F = 1.2145, P = 0.31017) but a marginally significant effect for patient type (F = 4.8922, P = 0.04118) and an interaction between physician status and patient type (F = 3.7902, P = 0.06853).

Similarly, neither pCREB1a nor pCREB1c levels varied significantly between time periods in both the non-hibernation and hibernation seasons [one-way ANOVA, p = 0.831 (pCREB1a, non-hibernation), p = 0.0413 (pCREB1a, hibernation), p = 0.282 (pCREB1c, non-hibernation), p = 0.213 (pCREB1c, hibernation)], of which, although the one-way ANOVA analysis showed a marginally significant difference for pCREB1a in the hibernation season ( p = 0.0413), the subsequent Tukey’s test showed no significant difference in pairwise comparisons (Fig. 4 e, f).

However, at the 21‐day time point, while there was a marginally significant difference between the procedures ( p = 0.0415), this did not reach the threshold of statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons according to Bonferroni; therefore, no superiority can be claimed at this time point.

For ZIKV Asian genotype, the variance among sire means was 0.008 and not significant ( p = 0.0918), and h 2 was 0.1526 and marginally significant ( p = 0.0416).

3 a, b), foraging guild remained a significant driver of fungal diversity ( n = 45, R = 0.239, P = 0.0004), and migration became marginally significant ( n = 45, DF = 2, F = 1.343, R 2 = 0.060, P = 0.0416).

The two-way interaction between vertical displacement and horizontal misalignment was marginally significant, F (2,86) = 3.293, p = .0419, η p 2 = .037.